Quote:
Originally posted by Metaphysical:
sky sports' coverage of football is massively sensationalist and is designed to keep you watching football and make even ordinary games seem massive.
think of the average length of FM games. adding all that uneccessary fluff would get so TIRESOME after 10-20 in-game years.
and what's wrong with the way FM looks? I don't get the clamouring for graphics. are you that dense and ADD that you need pretty pictures everywhere to tell you what's going on?
FM's GUI is simple, easy to understand, and a very effective way of communicating complex and constantly changing data. that's why it's worked until now and that's why it will CONTINUE to work into the forseeable future.
occam's razor, my friend.
|
First of all I’m going to overlook your aggressive stance and resorting to callig people dense for having a constructive discussion about features.
The point I was making about Sky Sports is that their graphical looks and use is there to help build atmosphere, and to obviously entertain. Correct, it may extend the game and draw out careers, but perhaps that could be controlled with some kind of user option tweak. The point is, I was just throwing ideas around not wanitng to get drawn into specifics of HOW SI should put more graphics/images/video/animation into the game . The fact remains that by making the game more graphical it would help to built atmosphere within the game greatly improve a player gaming experience.
Quote:
It seems to me here that people are presenting a choice between a good match engine and database etc or a well presented and flashy version of FM.
What the hell is the problem with having both?
People will be getting payed a lot of money to make developments to this game and it really hasn't developed a lot for 3-4 years.
WE NEED BOTH!
|
That was exactly my point, why are we worried about a graphical inclusion effecting gameplay – the realism and game play is already there, this would Only improve and SI’s track record with quality speaks for it’s self so there shouldn’t be a worry that they would suddenly do away with the gameplay in order to provide a more realistic and graphical interface.
The problem is the hardcore fanbois have had FM dominate for so long they are no longer open to “outside” ideas that would have previously been flagship features of rival titles. Well, as the competition are now starting to catch-up with FM, it’s time for SI and it’s fanboi’s to get off the high-horse and start to look at the competition and start improving on the best and more relevant features they offer!
Quote:
Even if there is no graphical update the presentation could be so much better.
It's like wading through a cumbersome database at the moment rather than a football manager game.
The interface could be much more slick even without any graphics at all.
At work I have to do lots of statistics on our business/department performance. This involves lots and lots of data on excel. When I have to present this to management I obviously don't just hand them a printout of excel. I have to make it into a presentation which looks nice, it looks slick, it looks interesting. At the moment FM is just like the excel part - everything is there but it's just like a database.
|
Again, this is my point. No one is talking about doing away with the stats system and having little football icons for rating players, just a better more friendly way of displaying all the info FM provides and making it easier to digest and even entertaining to look at (if that's possible, which I'm sure it is!).