If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
Originally posted by BayernMB:
Even if goalie is on the ground such goal is irreguler, becaufe the striker touched the ball 2-times in row without any other players touched it.
the goalie saved it so he didnt touch it twice in a row
Originally posted by ajw10:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Ryan,,,:
Are you sure the goalie wasn't on the ground. It's hard to tell with this 2D game thing.3D would sort it.
No thanks, would rather SI sort out the transfer system, the confidence, tactics and the atch engine before going anywhere near 3d. </BLOCKQUOTE>
Not again, PLEASE.
Id just say that the keeper was on the ground so therefore couldn't get to it.
Originally posted by BayernMB:
Even if goalie is on the ground such goal is irreguler, becaufe the striker touched the ball 2-times in row without any other players touched it.
Surely that's not the case, that would mean if the taker hit the post and it rebounded right back to him he couldn't touch it and would have to wait for one of his players to run over and kick it.
Originally posted by Neji:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by ajw10:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Ryan,,,:
Are you sure the goalie wasn't on the ground. It's hard to tell with this 2D game thing.3D would sort it.
No thanks, would rather SI sort out the transfer system, the confidence, tactics and the atch engine before going anywhere near 3d. </BLOCKQUOTE>
Not again, PLEASE.
Id just say that the keeper was on the ground so therefore couldn't get to it. </BLOCKQUOTE>
Logical tbh. Happens a lot IRL that the penalty taker scores a rebound if the keeper saves it.