If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
I rarely have a spare keeper, as i like to have maximum choice for all scenarios once in game (apart from keeper sent off :p)
Its only bitten me about twice.
05-31-2008, 01:37 AM
Do you always have a keeper on the bench? Post #23
in the Australian league (A-League) it is a league rule to have a keeper on the bench plus you only get 4 subs ie 1 x keeper + 3 players. I generally go for 1 keeper, 1 def, 1 mid, 1 striker
05-31-2008, 01:38 AM
Do you always have a keeper on the bench? Post #24
Always. Too risky. The one time I only had one fit keeper (on 07), I had to put Ronaldo in goal in the Madrid derby, and lost 7-1 (ironically the 1 was scored by Ronaldo before Adan got injured!)
05-31-2008, 02:03 AM
Do you always have a keeper on the bench? Post #27
Originally posted by SCIAG:
Always. Too risky. The one time I only had one fit keeper (on 07), I had to put Ronaldo in goal in the Madrid derby, and lost 7-1 (ironically the 1 was scored by Ronaldo before Adan got injured!)
Thats very unrealistic though, isn't it.
We all know when an outfield player goes in goal, he never concedes and pulls off world class saves, an more often than not, saves a penalty. Shortly after you'll see him ripping off his shirt to reveal a the "Superman" S
05-31-2008, 02:14 AM
Do you always have a keeper on the bench? Post #28
ive always had a keeper on the bench just incase although ive never had one injured or sent off but if my keeper was to play a howler i would look into subing him and give my other keeper a chance to get a shot in 1st team
05-31-2008, 02:59 AM
Do you always have a keeper on the bench? Post #30
Linear Mode
