If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
Well, think of your West Ham team before, they was amazing and had the best players, which would of meant Chelsea would play there utmost best.
Then you restarted and you had basic players, this would mean Chelsea could of taken you much lighter and dossed around on the pitch, it could of been a shock result or just a fluke for you to score. Hope this helps. :thup:
probably the same reason that southampton could beat man utd before but probably never could again. fuke.
stamina,morale,motivation,workrate, how well the team play together,oppos players,formations,morale,motivation,workrate,stam ina,how well the team play together could also have an effect.
I read somewhere on here that it's easy to beat Chelsea if you play one up front as you look to have done. I don't know if that was just with Avram in charge though. Was he sacked early in your older game? That would explain why you struggled against him before but beat him this time
Originally posted by bigwills88:
I read somewhere on here that it's easy to beat Chelsea if you play one up front as you look to have done. I don't know if that was just with Avram in charge though. Was he sacked early in your older game? That would explain why you struggled against him before but beat him this time
Chelsea were the one team I had no trouble beating in the Premier league. Due to playing a very fast striker upfront and Chelsea's defence pushing very very high up the pitch, a simple lob over the defence and my striker was through and I would win about 6-0. Anyway its not that realistic to beat Chelsea, even with star players. I mean In real life this season Manure only beat Chelsea through penalties in the season.