Bababui

In my first season at Leigh, Kettering are tearing things up with only 1 loss in 25 matches. I was checking out their setup and I noticed that they are 9/11 on training/youth facilities with a youth academy.

I thought that was pretty unrealistic and I didnt remember it from the 06 or 07 editions. So I checked 07 and they were 5/6.

I randomly selected 6 Conference sides to compare against:

Kettering 9 train 11 YA

Kidderminster 3/0
Forest Green 10/4
Exeter 6/8
Torquay 6/3
York 10/7
Altrincham 6/6

Has Kettering made a massive investment in their facilities in the last year or is the Kettering info wrong and should I edit it back to what it was?

Cosmo-poof

This place is not the correct one to ask about using the editor to change things. It's just about a way of playing.

I would advise you to ask the question either in the General Questions place or to get into contact with one of the data researchers.

Bababui

It was advised that I post it here. And Ter closed the GD thread.

Bababui

And its about using the editor to correct things. A big difference.

Cosmo-poof

You were advised to post it in the corresponding non-league thread (!) in the GD forum.
Nobody told you to post it here, where there is a strict no-editors rule. This is not the data-correctors place.

Bababui

I see your point and will post it there.

To the other point, if the Kettering data is wrong, and it probably is, it completely unbalances the game. Why would it be wrong to edit the info to make the game come closer to reality?

Cosmo-poof

It doesn't unbalance the game any more than if a player is rated incorrectly and thus way better in the game than in real life.

If the problem is immense, like it was with the Tottenham / Portsmouth thing, SIgames will release a patch. Installing the patch is fair play. Using the editor to "correct things" is a no. Where will it end? The next one uses it to correct some other things, like giving his favourite team some more reputation because he thinks they are so great.

You see the point?

Bababui

I see the point but anyone playing LLM as Kettering has an easy walk to League 2 based on the inaccurate training and youth facility ratings. Perhaps Kettering should be banned from the LLM challenge? However, it does add an interesting challenge to a human player playing any other ECN team.

Sancho

Baba,

(1) LLM is not a challenge. Read the header and guidelines to try and understand the forum you have stumbled onto.

(2) We don't care about the editor, or changing the editor. We play the game as is.

(3) Get it? If not, read the headers and guidelines again. If you still don't get it, well I guess you will realize that LLM and you are incompatible...

Have a good day.

Bababui

yeah thx bye