If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
Originally posted by brookie1402:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Klimowicz:
i asked for the minimum when renewing mine, 5 year contract on £77K. whats the point in taking £200K+ p/w?
unless it doesn't harm the finances, of course...
Makes you harder to sack when you screw up if you've got a huge contract. </BLOCKQUOTE>
what be this "sack" that you speak of?
i doubt that you'd be offered a new contract on such a wage if you were capable of screwing up. does it really make a difference? how bad would you have to be on a £200K wage to get this "sack"?
don't you guys ever go for long term contracts? on two occasions, the messed up confidence system suggested that despite the title being a formality, the board were looking for a replacement manager and refusing to renew my 2 year contract until the league was secured mathematically. as soon as i got the message confirming the title, there was a message from the board who were worried that i would leave because i hadn't signed a new deal yet. thats why i went for a 5 year contract on the lowest wage, at least it would be 5 years before i get that irrelevant message again.
If you start the game managing Arsenal, you are given a ridiculous contract after just a season. Mine was £115,000 a week. Why? I'd taken over an excellent club and won the league, that's hardly a massive achievement.
thats why i went for a 5 year contract on the lowest wage, at least it would be 5 years before i get that irrelevant message again.
Linear Mode
