retired_nnifeitak

Rangers have won a domestic treble seven times in the last 60 years. With how strong Celtic are now, do you not think a manager who took them to that feat again would not be lauded?

retired_Kylie

Rangers have won a domestic treble seven times in the last 60 years. With how strong Celtic are now, do you not think a manager who took them to that feat again would not be lauded? </BLOCKQUOTE>

Yeah I suppose it's a fair point, Unproven was probably a bad choice of word, maybe low reputation would have been better? But then again, I suppose you would have a fairly high national reputation if you won the treble?

deantibbetts

Rangers have won a domestic treble seven times in the last 60 years. With how strong Celtic are now, do you not think a manager who took them to that feat again would not be lauded? </BLOCKQUOTE>

I certainly wouldn't think they were fantastic, Celtic are extremely average under Strachan and the squad Smith has built (i.e. the in game squad) is extremely strong. As a Rangers fan, I fully expect the team to challenge and win the treble almost every year, nevermind how many time weve done it in the past. The only actual gauge for success in Scotland right now is Europe, with the added benefit of possibly beating Celtic in the league.

retired_marcias

It's totally natural for any business to re-assess all its finances every year and aportion different amounts to different areas than previously.

If you want to be sure to spend transfer money you'll have to spend it before that reassessment.