If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
i think there should be an option to ultimatum to get the chairman to reject this. or sack u i had a player called Raffael De Vita, bought him 55k for grimsby league 2 got to league 1 and he was worth 1.7mill and watford offered 1.7mill for him and i lost him :'(
Originally posted by ZeroCrusade:
Not when you have ~100+ million available for transfers . . . and when he's practically the center of your team (FYI he's a created Chinese Player) and without him, my midfield would probably crumble.
But a chairman is a business man, NOT a football manager. Microsoft make too much money but I can't see them saying, "Right, we've made enough now lads, let's pack it up" Business men always want to make more profit. Chairmen and Managers will always disagree on this sort of subject, it must happen IRL too.
If he had sold your player for 15m or something, I'd see your complaint but 45m? Almost every player in the world would go for that. Your player sounds alot like Gerrard and Liverpool almost sold him to Chelski for around 30m (not 100%).
Happens in football all the time, sometimes in reverse ala Abramovich and Mourinho. You got double the amount he was valued, what Chairman on earth would take your word and say no no we can do without that extra 20m?
If you are at Bayern and have 100m to spend how exactly would your midfield crumble because of the loss of one player?
Originally posted by Nomis07:
Happens in football all the time, sometimes in reverse ala Abramovich and Mourinho. You got double the amount he was valued, what Chairman on earth would take your word and say no no we can do without that extra 20m?
If you are at Bayern and have 100m to spend how exactly would your midfield crumble because of the loss of one player?
Well, in my game Kompany was valued 14,5 mil.€ and Beckenbauer accepted a 21 mil.€ offer. The problem was, that I've had to pay 45% of that to Hamburg, so I got a little more than 10 mil. for a class defender and had to spend 25 mil. for a new one. And my finances were superb, I was the 2nd richest club in the world behind Barca.
Surely that's your own fault BayernMB, I never never never make a bid with a sell on clause and given your financial situation I don't know why you did. I would have thought it would be quite hard for the game to be built so as to recognise when there is a sell on clause and how much it is worth and whether or not it is still good value.
i had 4 wingers in my team, Babel, Anderson, Leto and Fernadez ( I am Liverpool) One january transfer window the chairman decides that offers for Babel, Anderson and Leto were togood and sold them. i would have been ablee to cope but out of the rought 45-50mill i got for these three players he gave me 1 mill extra to spend on transfers.
So i had one winger (Mataias Fernadez, and about 10mill to spend)
Originally posted by TheRedAnt:
i had 4 wingers in my team, Babel, Anderson, Leto and Fernadez ( I am Liverpool) One january transfer window the chairman decides that offers for Babel, Anderson and Leto were togood and sold them. i would have been ablee to cope but out of the rought 45-50mill i got for these three players he gave me 1 mill extra to spend on transfers.
So i had one winger (Mataias Fernadez, and about 10mill to spend)
What were your finances at the time? You must have spent a lot getting Anderson and Fernandez etc maybe he didn't like the way the balance was considering the huge loan debt Liverpool have.
Originally posted by Nomis07:
Surely that's your own fault BayernMB, I never never never make a bid with a sell on clause and given your financial situation I don't know why you did. I would have thought it would be quite hard for the game to be built so as to recognise when there is a sell on clause and how much it is worth and whether or not it is still good value.
I agree, that is't partly my fault, but don't you think, that a chairman should consider such clauses, before he offloads a star player... When I bought him, I didn't have that much transfer funds, and I never considered selling this player before he was 31-32 years old and then hic price wouldn't be so high that It would matter much
But that's what i'm saying, yes in an ideal world that should be the case. How can a computer game be programmd to recognised which transfer make economic sense wand which don't re: sell on fees. I dunno much about computers but i'd say it wouldn't be easy.
i had a player called Raffael De Vita, bought him 55k for grimsby league 2 got to league 1 and he was worth 1.7mill and watford offered 1.7mill for him 
and i lost him :'(
Linear Mode
