If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
It's like darts - there's the BDO (British Darts Organistion) and the Professional Darts Corporation (PDC). Two rival companies.
Just imagine there's the English Premier League with 10 teams in it, and a separate English Supreme League with another 10 teams in.
They operate separately and have no promotion/relegation to each other.
Perhaps if you take rugby as a whole as 1 sport, then you could (loosely) compare it to Rugby Union and Rugby League - two different entities that have no promotion/relegation to each other.
In my opinion, it's a shame for any sport that has competing factions. I think the sport would benefit from having them all under 1 roof, so to speak. It would create more interest, more big games, and wouldn't divide the fans. As another example, you could use the sport (or entertainment?) of wrestling back in the 1990's, when you had WWF, WCW and ECW. Fans were divided. The way that sport is run is slightly different, so comparisons can't be totally made, but in my opinion, America having two separate league operators is not helping the sport over there.
Having said all that.......
If the MLS is included in FM, then perhaps a case could be made for the other league to be as well.
America having two separate league operators is not helping the sport over there.
But it's really not hurting it, either, since promotion/relegation is non-existent in our sports. As a result, no one knows any different.
For us, competing leagues is just a fact of life - it's all we know. Whoever provides the better product is the one we all naturally follow - leaving the others to seize-up and die(or merge with the bigger league, if they're lucky).
As for the original topic,
I don't want to see the USL yet. Before I ask for more American leagues, I want to see proof that SI even care enough about our leagues to include them correctly.
Originally posted by B. Stinson:
<BLOCKQUOTE>America having two separate league operators is not helping the sport over there.
But it's really not hurting it, either, since promotion/relegation is non-existent in our sports. As a result, no one knows any different.
For us, competing leagues is just a fact of life - it's all we know. Whoever provides the better product is the one we all naturally follow - leaving the others to seize-up and die(or merge with the bigger league, if they're lucky).
As for the original topic,
I don't want to see the USL yet. Before I ask for more American leagues, I want to see proof that SI even care enough about our leagues to include them correctly. </BLOCKQUOTE>
It really doesn't matter here. I love football but I had actually no idea about the existence of this league. And in fact I have seen only games involving DC United (because of Adu) LA (because of Beckam) and NY (I live close and these games are broadcast.
In fact that is the problem most games you cannot see on National TV only local. And also SportCenter a 1 hr daily show talks about 2 minutes about the results and that is only when the season is on.
So I apologize if I am rude but the FM sales in US are possibly explained by the immigrants like me that do not play that league anyway.