retired_lanice2001

So you're telling me that Ronaldo's first touch, dribbling and technique is not as good as Elano's ?!

And in case you want to know, Ronaldo has 13 for consistency. So even that's wrong IMHO.

retired_lanice2001

I think it's pretty silly that the man with 25 goals so far this season has inferior attacking stats to the man that has around... well 4 I believe. Elano has 16 for finishing, 19 for composure and 18 for off the ball. Just writing that made me smile because it feels so wrong. How can Ronaldo only have 14 for off the ball anyway?

retired_jcuff01

i feel more sorry for anderson.

the lad has played so well filling scholes shoes in a side like united yet at his peak, he is just about quality enough for derby.

retired_jcuff01

elano is overrated.

we simply haven't seen enough of him to determine his mental stats.

he is not consistently mentally good enough. he goes missing in games, makes some miss passes and generally is physically fairly weak whenever i see him (this is compared to strong players).

really overrated. he is not the most composed either.

compare him to other plays and you can see his stats should be brought down. elano on the game should be good technically, but not so much mentally because that would cause an imbalance which would mean hes no where near as good as he should be.

retired_dellydoolittle

silva, alves, aimar, (all english players, except gerrard) and many others have allwys been overrated. what makes me proud is that database now, looks much more like my own

retired_dellydoolittle

I agree. this looks ridiclous! that's why I make my own darabase :p

dejasade

dribbling is the same in your screenshot.
i wouldn't know about their first touch but 17 for ronaldo is hardly bad and again for technique.

ronaldo consistancy stat is wrong if it's 13 because he's showing that he's imprvoed his consistancy alot.

actually i would also so ronaldos strength should be higher than 13 too.

so lets say we look at these two players stats and deduce that they are roughly the same in terms of technical elano better mentaly and ronaldo better physically.

just becuase a plyaer has better technical stats doesn't mean he necessarily has the other stats to be able to use them.

personally i wouldn't even say elano was as good as ronaldo technically but to say the game is saying ronaldo is far inferior to elano seems to be a bit off

retired_lanice2001

I disagree because Ronaldo is a lot more creative than 11 and is a better passer than what he has been set as... I think he's more creative than Elano anyway and that can be shown with the number of assists so far IRL this season - on a general scale at least.

retired_jcuff01

just because ronaldo is fast, doesn't mean hes not creative.

i don't agree ronaldo is really creative if you think of pirlo.

however, thinking of elano's performances, i can't really think of many super-amazing through balls or crosses which only so many people in the world could have though of (aka alonso, pirlo etc.). its all just technical graft with good decision making.

retired_dellydoolittle

I just guess it's bad researching, bad in-put and bad testing. no way elano could have so good stats. what's his CA, probably more then 175?! I know how much it takes to bring reflecting stats from editor to the game. he's just one of those many over rated players. some examples how they look on my database:

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/4431/adeej0.jpg

http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/2131/elanojk1.jpg

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/8...istianone0.jpg

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/3214/silvake2.jpg

http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/10/modricgh0.jpg

http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/4893/rooneykk0.jpg