star

I know it seems a bit daft when players never get 10's for amazing performances

BUT i like how the average ratings for players are not as extremely diverse anymore

What i mean is that on the older versions a top player might average late 7s and even early 8s for a season whereas a rubbish plater will average around 6

on this version, it is rare to see top player averaging anything more than 7.3, this means that it is harder to distinguish between the best performing players without doing a bit more research on their stats or watching their game (more like real life)

Anyone agree?

Also why does nobody ever get 1 or 2 and why is 5 not just an average performance? because it should be

retired_deeparati

I agree with what you described.

Since the game starts with 6 as rating (# in middle), if a player is brought in and does nothing, it's 6. You can imagine if he does something below nothing, 5 or below are just simply BAD.
And to have 1 or 2 is very rare since he has to do everything wrong in that game.

star

i can see what you mean but if players can get 9 or 10's then they should get 1 and 2's

retired_tspear

Have you EVER seen a player rated as 1 or 2 IRL? Put simply, if ever a player was to receive such a rating he simply shouldn't be playing football... or he's broken both his legs and possibly the use of his eyes!

retired_storeypc

Have you EVER seen a player rated as 1 or 2 IRL? Put simply, if ever a player was to receive such a rating he simply shouldn't be playing football... or he's broken both his legs and possibly the use of his eyes! </BLOCKQUOTE>

Agree :thup:

star

If we consider that a player would never play with two broken legs then why should a player not get 1, 2 if that means 1/10 in the context of what is possible from a uninjured professional footballer

retired_emzmcgee

Have you EVER seen a player rated as 1 or 2 IRL? Put simply, if ever a player was to receive such a rating he simply shouldn't be playing football... or he's broken both his legs and possibly the use of his eyes! </BLOCKQUOTE>

Titus Bramble.

Crazydude

Have you EVER seen a player rated as 1 or 2 IRL? Put simply, if ever a player was to receive such a rating he simply shouldn't be playing football... or he's broken both his legs and possibly the use of his eyes! </BLOCKQUOTE>

Titus Bramble. </BLOCKQUOTE>

:thup:

star

Exactly or Capaca against Portsmouth

DBrown87

Perhaps a 1 or 2 should be given out if a striker misses multiple open goals by trying to be clever and blow the ball over the line, AND he runs in to a post TWICE and loses his eyesight.

A defender could get a 1 if he decapitates a player with a high flying karate kick.

Other than that I can't see how a 1 or 2 would be possible to get.