If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
I know it seems a bit daft when players never get 10's for amazing performances
BUT i like how the average ratings for players are not as extremely diverse anymore
What i mean is that on the older versions a top player might average late 7s and even early 8s for a season whereas a rubbish plater will average around 6
on this version, it is rare to see top player averaging anything more than 7.3, this means that it is harder to distinguish between the best performing players without doing a bit more research on their stats or watching their game (more like real life)
Anyone agree?
Also why does nobody ever get 1 or 2 and why is 5 not just an average performance? because it should be
11-07-2007, 04:14 PM
Does anybody else like the new player ratings? Post #2
Since the game starts with 6 as rating (# in middle), if a player is brought in and does nothing, it's 6. You can imagine if he does something below nothing, 5 or below are just simply BAD.
And to have 1 or 2 is very rare since he has to do everything wrong in that game.
11-07-2007, 04:27 PM
Does anybody else like the new player ratings? Post #3
Originally posted by SiDolman:
i can see what you mean but if players can get 9 or 10's then they should get 1 and 2's
Have you EVER seen a player rated as 1 or 2 IRL? Put simply, if ever a player was to receive such a rating he simply shouldn't be playing football... or he's broken both his legs and possibly the use of his eyes!
11-07-2007, 05:02 PM
Does anybody else like the new player ratings? Post #5
Originally posted by binobasher:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by SiDolman:
i can see what you mean but if players can get 9 or 10's then they should get 1 and 2's
Have you EVER seen a player rated as 1 or 2 IRL? Put simply, if ever a player was to receive such a rating he simply shouldn't be playing football... or he's broken both his legs and possibly the use of his eyes! </BLOCKQUOTE>
Agree :thup:
11-07-2007, 05:15 PM
Does anybody else like the new player ratings? Post #6
Have you EVER seen a player rated as 1 or 2 IRL? Put simply, if ever a player was to receive such a rating he simply shouldn't be playing football... or he's broken both his legs and possibly the use of his eyes!
If we consider that a player would never play with two broken legs then why should a player not get 1, 2 if that means 1/10 in the context of what is possible from a uninjured professional footballer
11-07-2007, 05:18 PM
Does anybody else like the new player ratings? Post #7
Originally posted by binobasher:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by SiDolman:
i can see what you mean but if players can get 9 or 10's then they should get 1 and 2's
Have you EVER seen a player rated as 1 or 2 IRL? Put simply, if ever a player was to receive such a rating he simply shouldn't be playing football... or he's broken both his legs and possibly the use of his eyes! </BLOCKQUOTE>
Titus Bramble.
11-07-2007, 05:21 PM
Does anybody else like the new player ratings? Post #8
Originally posted by Annihilator666:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by binobasher:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by SiDolman:
i can see what you mean but if players can get 9 or 10's then they should get 1 and 2's
Have you EVER seen a player rated as 1 or 2 IRL? Put simply, if ever a player was to receive such a rating he simply shouldn't be playing football... or he's broken both his legs and possibly the use of his eyes! </BLOCKQUOTE>
Titus Bramble. </BLOCKQUOTE>
:thup:
11-07-2007, 05:22 PM
Does anybody else like the new player ratings? Post #9
Perhaps a 1 or 2 should be given out if a striker misses multiple open goals by trying to be clever and blow the ball over the line, AND he runs in to a post TWICE and loses his eyesight.
A defender could get a 1 if he decapitates a player with a high flying karate kick.
Other than that I can't see how a 1 or 2 would be possible to get.