Quote:
Originally posted by bullet tooth tony:
Not really true about the small pitch size a relegation battlers.
If you are plyaing against a team who are very good at short passing and do it quickly then they can move through you just as easy. Alternatively if they have a big target man then they can play direct/long and play off the knock downs.
In short in my opinion it doesnt help to have a small pitch if your a poor team. It will help however to have a big pitch if you are an excellent attacking team
|
I disagree with both of your points. Unsurprisingly, I'm sure.
First, the case of the team who are very good at short passing, and do it quickly: on a smaller pitch, there is less space between your defenders, so there is less room for the off-the-ball runs which get people open. Consequently, any ball into "space" is more likely to be challenged for by a defender, and there's more chance that another of your defenders is in close proximity to the new ballcarrier.
Yes, a succession of one-touch passes can still generate a chance - but its not "just as easy" as it would be on a larger pitch.
Similarly with the big target man approach - the same problems apply for the attacking team whether they're playing one-touch or knock ons. Plus, if nothing else, there is less space between your back line and your goalkeeper, so flick-ons into that space have a better chance of getting picked up by an outrushing keeper.
. .
One other thing I thought of while reading your reply, however - it would probably be of benefit to be on a smaller pitch if your players are below the average Stamina for the league that you're in. If you've got fitness problems.. smaller pitch dimensions should mean less running which should mean a higher Condition at the end of each game - and therefore higher Condition at the start of the next game.
This might also be an argument for a smaller pitch if you have a small squad: as an Arsenal, you can always afford to rotate, but not every manager has that luxury.