craig80

I have been trying to edit the finances for Hearts and have given them a 'sugar daddy'. Vladimir Romanov fulfills this role in real life - while he isn't splashing vast amounts of cash he does find and buy players and pays wages out of his own pocket. The problem is that when I select the sugar daddy option in the editor it gives me a balance of £23m with £9m to spend. I have tried to counteract this by giving the club a negative balance and no transfer funds but this makes no difference. Ideally I would like to have the chairman as a sugar daddy but a maximum of £1-1.5m to spend as I want it to be fairly realistic. Is anyone aware of a financial set up that you can select in the editor that gives you a sugar daddy but doesn't give you masses of spending money (basically a sugar daddy on a budget)?

Stevenhp1987

if its a man on a budget, then hes not a sugar daddy then is he?

a sugar daddy is someone who will pump hundreds of millions into the club, the only "real" one, or closest to, is Roman Abramovich & Chelsea.

Roadways

Why give yourself a Sugar Daddy if you want a specific amount? Why not just increase the balance of the club / or the wage bill / or transfer budget.
Sorry seems an obvious suggestion.
Thought a Sugar Daddy would give you limitless money, which is not what you want, he'll possibly interfere with choosing who comes to the club too.