retired_m10234

Why is crossing included in set piece training? Surely it should be in attacking training? I ask because if you have a full back that doesn't take set pieces, it makes sense not to include much (if any) set piece training, but as it includes crossing you need to have your full backs having set piece training purely for the crossing.

Does all that make sense

retired_vsoukup

it would be a bit ridiculous if it wasn't in there to be honest, you could argue it the other way.

retired_nel1603

It's the same as heading being in with Ball Control (I believe).

Ball control is not something you want to do a lot of with your CD's.

retired_gwenlyn

And of the the most important defensive attributes - Composure - is in the Shooting training.

I agree that some of them are in strange training categories and I'd like them changed, but then I'd have to change all my training schedules.

retired_mgmgfns3

composure isn't a defensive attribute, it's to do with keeping cool when given a chance on goal.
Composure while defending is the conecntration attribute.

retired_mgmgfns3

sorry for double post, but I don't think set piece attirbutes take up CA in the same way as other attributes except for crossing. Therefore training a full back in set pieces to improve his crossing won't waste his CA when improving his other set piece stats.
Also set piece training doesn't take up much of the training workload even when set to intensive.