| » Stats |
Members: 103,662
Threads: 85,025
Posts: 1,031,308
Top Poster: Karky (9,548) | | Welcome to our newest member, sheedy | |
If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
 | |
10-25-2006, 01:24 AM
|
RoT Solid ( Tactics plus training, having great success!) Post #21 | | Newb
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by El Padre:
The only time this tactic is failing is against this formation (Don't know if this will come out right)
DR--DC--DC--DL
------DM------
----MC--MC----
*MR----------ML*
----FC----
*Farrows
I cant seem to compete against this 90 percent of the time, no idea why!
| Just keep the FBS back all the time (no FRs) and play the home tactic with no toher changes.
|
| |
10-25-2006, 01:28 AM
|
RoT Solid ( Tactics plus training, having great success!) Post #22 | | Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
nice! I've been using somehting very similar ever since reading wwfan's guide. Tactic works wonders |
| |
10-25-2006, 01:56 AM
|
RoT Solid ( Tactics plus training, having great success!) Post #23 | | Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by wwfan:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by El Padre:
The only time this tactic is failing is against this formation (Don't know if this will come out right)
DR--DC--DC--DL
------DM------
----MC--MC----
*MR----------ML*
----FC----
*Farrows
I cant seem to compete against this 90 percent of the time, no idea why!
| Just keep the FBS back all the time (no FRs) and play the home tactic with no toher changes. </BLOCKQUOTE>
Outstanding work, that mixed with a deep lying defensive line worked perfectly!
|
| |
10-25-2006, 02:27 AM
|
RoT Solid ( Tactics plus training, having great success!) Post #24 | | Joe Blow
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0 |
Hey El Padre. small question.
so obviously with the two strikers, one should have better passing than the other, and one should be more the finisher? sure. but what about the foot he uses? obviously if he didnt have a preference for either, that would be the best, but would the left striker benefit more from being left footed or right footed?
|
| |
10-25-2006, 02:36 AM
|
RoT Solid ( Tactics plus training, having great success!) Post #25 | | Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Doesn't seem to make too much difference, although it cant hurt having a left footer on the left.
|
| |
10-25-2006, 02:41 AM
|
RoT Solid ( Tactics plus training, having great success!) Post #26 | | Joe Blow
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0 |
well in my example, i have villa and adriano as my strikers. saying that, there shouldn't be any problems getting goals as it is, but would you have Adriano on the left, with Villa on the right? are there any strikers that would fit either mould better?
|
| |
10-25-2006, 03:02 AM
|
RoT Solid ( Tactics plus training, having great success!) Post #27 | | Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
I couldn't honestly say, need to just go with your own gut feeling on that one! :thup:
|
| |
10-25-2006, 03:06 AM
|
RoT Solid ( Tactics plus training, having great success!) Post #28 | | Joe Blow
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0 |
ok buddy. hope this works!!
will keep you updated!
|
| |
10-25-2006, 03:12 AM
|
RoT Solid ( Tactics plus training, having great success!) Post #29 | | Joe Blow
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0 |
Oh, sorry for another post. but another question. you have it down as your DC's with direct passing. would that mean that they have to have some passing ability? would the Heinze's (passing of around 5) of this world not do well at the back?
if not, are there any other stats you look for in certain positions apart from the obvious (marking tacking for DC's, crossing for ML/R etc etc)
|
| |
10-25-2006, 08:01 AM
|
RoT Solid ( Tactics plus training, having great success!) Post #30 | | In Orientation
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0 |
I try RoT For FBR-MR-FC FBL-ML-FC DCs-DMC-AMC separately seems work better ,but my pass set is all the same as the team set
|
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Other threads in forum Tactics & Training Tips | | Thread | Date | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post | Training Potential Wonderkids
Training Potential Wonderkids: I managed to get Preston Edwards on a free at the...
| 02-05-2008 | route1 | 2 | 02-05-2008 11:59 PM | Simmo's 4-3-1-2
Simmo's 4-3-1-2: So I've designed this tactic and it's been very...
| 12-29-2007 | SimmoMC | 3 | 12-29-2007 07:39 PM | sorry for the doublepost :(
sorry for the doublepost :(: :(
| 11-03-2007 | Evande | 1 | 11-03-2007 04:23 PM | 4-4-2 Magic box!! a formation for possesion football.
4-4-2 Magic box!! a formation for possesion football.: this is a formation in which everyone is set to...
| 11-29-2006 | defdik69 | 24 | 12-02-2006 08:55 PM | Wat is the best tactic so far?
Wat is the best tactic so far?: My question to you fellow managers is: What...
| 11-24-2006 | Quintano | 4 | 11-24-2006 04:16 PM | | » Online Users: 33 | | 0 members and 33 guests | | No Members online | | Most users ever online was 2,128, 07-21-2008 at 08:27 PM. | |