<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by pmyraje:
I know it is a whole different engine, but if the commentary in CM4 mirrors the commentary in CM 01/02 I'd be rather worried because half the time the commentary doesn't match the 2D representation at all - e.g. saying a player can't miss or whatever when he's pretty much shooting along the goal line with no chance of scoring from that angle<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Exactly. If anything, the CM3 engine was probably LESS realistic (i.e. more random approximations, and not down to the individual passes), and after comparing the CM4 2D to its text commentary I feel I've probably been just fooling myself all these years thinking I knew what my tactics are doing in CM3. Imagination is a powerful thing, but it's also easy to kid yourself.
The man/zonal marking issue is known and being adjusted - so it's one part of the tactics that isn't working that well yet, but I have the feeling most other instructions have rather plausible impacts on the pitch. I'm sure they'll get the marking right eventually (it's also supposedly depending on the skills of the defenders, and in LLM we tend to use crap defenders).
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Linear Mode
