Fitness.com
Advertisement

Go Back   Sports Forum > Community > Football Manager > Tactics & Training Tips

Tactics & Training Tips

It's no use having a squad full of star players without a decent way for them to play their football.


» Site Navigation
 > Shop
» Current Poll
Best 5 club teams in history of Football:
Liverpool 1977-1978 - 100.00%
1 Vote
Real Madrid 1956-1960 - 0%
0 Votes
Juventus 1985 - 0%
0 Votes
Milan 1989-1990 - 100.00%
1 Vote
Ajax 1971-1973 - 0%
0 Votes
Santos 1962-1963 - 0%
0 Votes
Torinho 1940's - 100.00%
1 Vote
Ajax 1995 - 0%
0 Votes
Flamengo 1981 - 100.00%
1 Vote
Benfica 1961-1962 - 100.00%
1 Vote
Total Votes: 1
You may not vote on this poll.
» Stats
Members: 104,572
Threads: 84,987
Posts: 1,031,253
Top Poster: hu5k1 (0)
Welcome to our newest member, andrewtuck569
» Fitness Shop
If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2006, 01:08 AM   Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #11
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
gunners4eva is infamous around these parts
Default

IMHO, I believe Ne jebi's got it on. A slow tempo is a slow tempo, your approach play will be slow. However if there is a counter-attacking opportunity, your team will ignore the slow game and go for their throats as fast as possible. It is possible to combine the two, if you watch a full match you would not see more than (depending on the quality of your opposition) more than 3 or 4 genuine counter attack opps in a whole game. Hopefully your strikers are clinical!! Your players' decision-making stats will also be crucial I think.
gunners4eva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2006, 01:15 AM   Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #12
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Ne jebi is infamous around these parts
Default

Yes yes it's about what Dayle said : your team should try the counter attack when a good number of opposing players are in your half of the pitch for example.

So here's what I think : if you have for example set slow tempo and no CA than you team will not try the CA even when the situation is ideal...they will continue to play slowly and not take advantage of the situation when it arises.
The opposite also doesnt' work because even if your team plays fast tempo that doesn't mean they are going to make a CA even when it is not ticked because fast tempo means fast passing BUT NOT NECESSARILY moving the ball always forward towards the enemy goal...because the team can play and action even with a couple of passes to the back...but with CA they try to play it always forward...I don't know man that makes sense for me
Ne jebi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2006, 01:17 AM   Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0
Tricolores is infamous around these parts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by gunners4eva:
IMHO, I believe Ne jebi's got it on. A slow tempo is a slow tempo, your approach play will be slow. However if there is a counter-attacking opportunity, your team will ignore the slow game and go for their throats as fast as possible. It is possible to combine the two, if you watch a full match you would not see more than (depending on the quality of your opposition) more than 3 or 4 genuine counter attack opps in a whole game. Hopefully your strikers are clinical!! Your players' decision-making stats will also be crucial I think.
Right, a combination of slow tempo and counter attack is what it will be then for my new tactic. It sounds logical and if I have to choose between ignoring great counter attack chances and possibly losing possession 1 or 2 times, it's an easy choice: I'll take the risc. Thanks people!
Tricolores is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2006, 01:20 AM   Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0
Tricolores is infamous around these parts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ne jebi:
Yes yes it's about what Dayle said : your team should try the counter attack when a good number of opposing players are in your half of the pitch for example.

So here's what I think : if you have for example set slow tempo and no CA than you team will not try the CA even when the situation is ideal...they will continue to play slowly and not take advantage of the situation when it arises.
The opposite also doesnt' work because even if your team plays fast tempo that doesn't mean they are going to make a CA even when it is not ticked because fast tempo means fast passing BUT NOT NECESSARILY moving the ball always forward towards the enemy goal...because the team can play and action even with a couple of passes to the back...but with CA they try to play it always forward...I don't know man that makes sense for me
In other words (what we kind of agreed on earlier): ALWAYS tick Counter Attack regardless of your kind op play and take the risc of losing possesion once or twice for granted). Well, that's one more option less to worry about in FM, hehe (can you believe I NEVER ticked Counter Attack before...always thought it was for cowardly underdogs)
Tricolores is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2006, 01:21 AM   Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #15
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Ne jebi is infamous around these parts
Default

NP tricolores !
Give it a try and report back with your findings...good luck!
Ne jebi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2006, 01:24 AM   Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0
Tricolores is infamous around these parts
Default

Oh dear Lord, why did I write risk with a c all the time... :o

Despite being Dutch, I know perfectly well that it should be risk with a k. In my defence: in Holland it's an hour later than in the UK, so it's already 1:22 AM. Time for bed.

nighty night.
Tricolores is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2006, 01:25 AM   Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0
Tricolores is infamous around these parts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ne jebi:
NP tricolores !
Give it a try and report back with your findings...good luck!
Will do!

But what does 'NP' stand for?
Tricolores is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2006, 01:25 AM   Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #18
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Ne jebi is infamous around these parts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tricolores:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Ne jebi:
Yes yes it's about what Dayle said : your team should try the counter attack when a good number of opposing players are in your half of the pitch for example.

So here's what I think : if you have for example set slow tempo and no CA than you team will not try the CA even when the situation is ideal...they will continue to play slowly and not take advantage of the situation when it arises.
The opposite also doesnt' work because even if your team plays fast tempo that doesn't mean they are going to make a CA even when it is not ticked because fast tempo means fast passing BUT NOT NECESSARILY moving the ball always forward towards the enemy goal...because the team can play and action even with a couple of passes to the back...but with CA they try to play it always forward...I don't know man that makes sense for me
In other words (what we kind of agreed on earlier): ALWAYS tick Counter Attack regardless of your kind op play and take the risc of losing possesion once or twice for granted). Well, that's one more option less to worry about in FM, hehe (can you believe I NEVER ticked Counter Attack before...always thought it was for cowardly underdogs) </BLOCKQUOTE>

Well even in the real life underdog teams always play that type of football...they try to defend as best and with a good bunch of players behing the ball and than try some thunder CA. Damn after all that's the most easy and most understandabvle type of action in football...players running fast on the counter and those with the ball trying some good passes into space
Ne jebi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2006, 01:26 AM   Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #19
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Ne jebi is infamous around these parts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tricolores:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Ne jebi:
NP tricolores !
Give it a try and report back with your findings...good luck!
Will do!

But what does 'NP' stand for? </BLOCKQUOTE>

NP stands for no problem
Ne jebi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2006, 01:28 AM   Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0
Tricolores is infamous around these parts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ne jebi:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Tricolores:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Ne jebi:
Yes yes it's about what Dayle said : your team should try the counter attack when a good number of opposing players are in your half of the pitch for example.

So here's what I think : if you have for example set slow tempo and no CA than you team will not try the CA even when the situation is ideal...they will continue to play slowly and not take advantage of the situation when it arises.
The opposite also doesnt' work because even if your team plays fast tempo that doesn't mean they are going to make a CA even when it is not ticked because fast tempo means fast passing BUT NOT NECESSARILY moving the ball always forward towards the enemy goal...because the team can play and action even with a couple of passes to the back...but with CA they try to play it always forward...I don't know man that makes sense for me
In other words (what we kind of agreed on earlier): ALWAYS tick Counter Attack regardless of your kind op play and take the risc of losing possesion once or twice for granted). Well, that's one more option less to worry about in FM, hehe (can you believe I NEVER ticked Counter Attack before...always thought it was for cowardly underdogs) </BLOCKQUOTE>

Well even in the real life underdog teams always play that type of football...they try to defend as best and with a good bunch of players behing the ball and than try some thunder CA. Damn after all that's the most easy and most understandabvle type of action in football...players running fast on the counter and those with the ball trying some good passes into space </BLOCKQUOTE>

Yeah, but I never wanted to play like an underdog... I wanted to play good football with good passes into space (like the way we are taught in Holland). Even our defenders aren't allowed to put the ball into row Z when under pressure... It has all got to look nice and pretty.
Tricolores is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Sports Forum > Community > Football Manager > Tactics & Training Tips

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar threads to Tempo vs. defending opposition...
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whats "tempo" anyway?
Whats "tempo" anyway?: got my FM and rushed to play(love that game) I...
Luiz Hemerly Football Manager 10 01-05-2008 06:08 PM
tempo and possession
tempo and possession: i've found that my players tend to hold on to the...
peter_b Tactics & Training Tips 2 11-22-2007 06:11 PM
Tempo
Tempo: What is the rule of thumb on tempo. Slower...
crazyscotsman Tactics & Training Tips 3 03-03-2007 01:55 AM
Mixed passing and tempo
Mixed passing and tempo: I have read various threads on here and everyone...
swfc going up Tactics & Training Tips 18 02-08-2007 08:15 PM
Which tempo do you recommend?
Which tempo do you recommend?: I have a problem: either my AML and AMR plays...
Ronaldo Luiz Tactics & Training Tips 22 12-30-2006 09:11 AM

More threads of Tricolores
Thread Date Forum Replies Last Post
How to get 5-star training with just 8 or 9 coaches?!
How to get 5-star training with just 8 or 9 coaches?!: Hi, Even at large premiership clubs, the...
01-19-2007 Tactics & Training Tips 9 01-20-2007 06:31 PM
Tempo vs. defending opposition...
Tempo vs. defending opposition...: Hi, I've been reading a LOT threads these...
12-29-2006 Tactics & Training Tips 23 01-08-2007 08:21 PM
What Width to use when playing slow & short
What Width to use when playing slow & short: Hi all, I'm currently working on a new...
12-29-2006 Tactics & Training Tips 7 12-31-2006 12:55 PM

Other threads in forum Tactics & Training Tips
Thread Date Thread Starter Replies Last Post
I think this game is against me!!!!
I think this game is against me!!!!: I'm really struggling in epl with crystal palace....
01-06-2008 ron.e 2 01-06-2008 11:55 PM
should henry be sold
should henry be sold: i am at end of season 3 and henry is 32, has...
11-19-2007 wallace4 1 11-19-2007 04:22 AM
need one of your tactics!!!
need one of your tactics!!!: having a mini crisis here at man utd...gr8 last...
02-13-2007 Skinaldo 1 02-13-2007 08:21 PM
tutoring
tutoring: what is the best way to have a player tutor...
02-11-2007 sb1984 6 02-12-2007 04:46 AM
Can 4-3-3 be successful?
Can 4-3-3 be successful?: When you say successful what do you mean? Do you...
11-23-2006 rashidi1 0 11-23-2006 03:08 AM

» Online Users: 58
0 members and 58 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 2,128, 07-21-2008 at 08:27 PM.

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Fitness.com | Weight Loss | Training & Fitness | BodyBuilding | Chinese | Spanish | French | Germany | Italian | Friend Codes |
You are viewing Tempo vs. defending opposition... - Page 2.