| » Stats |
Members: 104,572
Threads: 84,987
Posts: 1,031,253
Top Poster: hu5k1 (0) | | Welcome to our newest member, andrewtuck569 | |
If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
 | |
12-30-2006, 01:08 AM
|
Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #11 |
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
IMHO, I believe Ne jebi's got it on. A slow tempo is a slow tempo, your approach play will be slow. However if there is a counter-attacking opportunity, your team will ignore the slow game and go for their throats as fast as possible. It is possible to combine the two, if you watch a full match you would not see more than (depending on the quality of your opposition) more than 3 or 4 genuine counter attack opps in a whole game. Hopefully your strikers are clinical!!  Your players' decision-making stats will also be crucial I think.
|
| |
12-30-2006, 01:15 AM
|
Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #12 |
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Yes yes it's about what Dayle said : your team should try the counter attack when a good number of opposing players are in your half of the pitch for example.
So here's what I think : if you have for example set slow tempo and no CA than you team will not try the CA even when the situation is ideal...they will continue to play slowly and not take advantage of the situation when it arises.
The opposite also doesnt' work because even if your team plays fast tempo that doesn't mean they are going to make a CA even when it is not ticked because fast tempo means fast passing BUT NOT NECESSARILY moving the ball always forward towards the enemy goal...because the team can play and action even with a couple of passes to the back...but with CA they try to play it always forward...I don't know man that makes sense for me
|
| |
12-30-2006, 01:17 AM
|
Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #13 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by gunners4eva:
IMHO, I believe Ne jebi's got it on. A slow tempo is a slow tempo, your approach play will be slow. However if there is a counter-attacking opportunity, your team will ignore the slow game and go for their throats as fast as possible. It is possible to combine the two, if you watch a full match you would not see more than (depending on the quality of your opposition) more than 3 or 4 genuine counter attack opps in a whole game. Hopefully your strikers are clinical!! Your players' decision-making stats will also be crucial I think.
| Right, a combination of slow tempo and counter attack is what it will be then for my new tactic. It sounds logical and if I have to choose between ignoring great counter attack chances and possibly losing possession 1 or 2 times, it's an easy choice: I'll take the risc. Thanks people!
|
| |
12-30-2006, 01:20 AM
|
Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #14 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by Ne jebi:
Yes yes it's about what Dayle said : your team should try the counter attack when a good number of opposing players are in your half of the pitch for example.
So here's what I think : if you have for example set slow tempo and no CA than you team will not try the CA even when the situation is ideal...they will continue to play slowly and not take advantage of the situation when it arises.
The opposite also doesnt' work because even if your team plays fast tempo that doesn't mean they are going to make a CA even when it is not ticked because fast tempo means fast passing BUT NOT NECESSARILY moving the ball always forward towards the enemy goal...because the team can play and action even with a couple of passes to the back...but with CA they try to play it always forward...I don't know man that makes sense for me
| In other words (what we kind of agreed on earlier): ALWAYS tick Counter Attack regardless of your kind op play and take the risc of losing possesion once or twice for granted). Well, that's one more option less to worry about in FM, hehe (can you believe I NEVER ticked Counter Attack before...always thought it was for cowardly underdogs)
|
| |
12-30-2006, 01:21 AM
|
Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #15 |
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
NP tricolores !
Give it a try and report back with your findings...good luck! |
| |
12-30-2006, 01:24 AM
|
Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #16 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Oh dear Lord, why did I write risk with a c all the time... :o
Despite being Dutch, I know perfectly well that it should be risk with a k. In my defence: in Holland it's an hour later than in the UK, so it's already 1:22 AM. Time for bed.
nighty night.
|
| |
12-30-2006, 01:25 AM
|
Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #17 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by Ne jebi:
NP tricolores !
Give it a try and report back with your findings...good luck! | Will do!
But what does 'NP' stand for?
|
| |
12-30-2006, 01:25 AM
|
Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #18 |
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by Tricolores:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Ne jebi:
Yes yes it's about what Dayle said : your team should try the counter attack when a good number of opposing players are in your half of the pitch for example.
So here's what I think : if you have for example set slow tempo and no CA than you team will not try the CA even when the situation is ideal...they will continue to play slowly and not take advantage of the situation when it arises.
The opposite also doesnt' work because even if your team plays fast tempo that doesn't mean they are going to make a CA even when it is not ticked because fast tempo means fast passing BUT NOT NECESSARILY moving the ball always forward towards the enemy goal...because the team can play and action even with a couple of passes to the back...but with CA they try to play it always forward...I don't know man that makes sense for me
| In other words (what we kind of agreed on earlier): ALWAYS tick Counter Attack regardless of your kind op play and take the risc of losing possesion once or twice for granted). Well, that's one more option less to worry about in FM, hehe (can you believe I NEVER ticked Counter Attack before...always thought it was for cowardly underdogs) </BLOCKQUOTE>
Well even in the real life underdog teams always play that type of football...they try to defend as best and with a good bunch of players behing the ball and than try some thunder CA. Damn after all that's the most easy and most understandabvle type of action in football...players running fast on the counter and those with the ball trying some good passes into space |
| |
12-30-2006, 01:26 AM
|
Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #19 |
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by Tricolores:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Ne jebi:
NP tricolores !
Give it a try and report back with your findings...good luck! | Will do!
But what does 'NP' stand for? </BLOCKQUOTE>
NP stands for no problem |
| |
12-30-2006, 01:28 AM
|
Tempo vs. defending opposition... Post #20 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by Ne jebi:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Tricolores:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Ne jebi:
Yes yes it's about what Dayle said : your team should try the counter attack when a good number of opposing players are in your half of the pitch for example.
So here's what I think : if you have for example set slow tempo and no CA than you team will not try the CA even when the situation is ideal...they will continue to play slowly and not take advantage of the situation when it arises.
The opposite also doesnt' work because even if your team plays fast tempo that doesn't mean they are going to make a CA even when it is not ticked because fast tempo means fast passing BUT NOT NECESSARILY moving the ball always forward towards the enemy goal...because the team can play and action even with a couple of passes to the back...but with CA they try to play it always forward...I don't know man that makes sense for me
| In other words (what we kind of agreed on earlier): ALWAYS tick Counter Attack regardless of your kind op play and take the risc of losing possesion once or twice for granted). Well, that's one more option less to worry about in FM, hehe (can you believe I NEVER ticked Counter Attack before...always thought it was for cowardly underdogs) </BLOCKQUOTE>
Well even in the real life underdog teams always play that type of football...they try to defend as best and with a good bunch of players behing the ball and than try some thunder CA. Damn after all that's the most easy and most understandabvle type of action in football...players running fast on the counter and those with the ball trying some good passes into space  </BLOCKQUOTE>
Yeah, but I never wanted to play like an underdog... I wanted to play good football with good passes into space (like the way we are taught in Holland). Even our defenders aren't allowed to put the ball into row Z when under pressure... It has all got to look nice and pretty.
|
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Similar threads to Tempo vs. defending opposition... | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | Whats "tempo" anyway?
Whats "tempo" anyway?: got my FM and rushed to play(love that game)
I... | Luiz Hemerly | Football Manager | 10 | 01-05-2008 06:08 PM | tempo and possession
tempo and possession: i've found that my players tend to hold on to the... | peter_b | Tactics & Training Tips | 2 | 11-22-2007 06:11 PM | Tempo
Tempo: What is the rule of thumb on tempo. Slower... | crazyscotsman | Tactics & Training Tips | 3 | 03-03-2007 01:55 AM | Mixed passing and tempo
Mixed passing and tempo: I have read various threads on here and everyone... | swfc going up | Tactics & Training Tips | 18 | 02-08-2007 08:15 PM | Which tempo do you recommend?
Which tempo do you recommend?: I have a problem: either my AML and AMR plays... | Ronaldo Luiz | Tactics & Training Tips | 22 | 12-30-2006 09:11 AM |
Other threads in forum Tactics & Training Tips | | Thread | Date | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post | I think this game is against me!!!!
I think this game is against me!!!!: I'm really struggling in epl with crystal palace....
| 01-06-2008 | ron.e | 2 | 01-06-2008 11:55 PM | should henry be sold
should henry be sold: i am at end of season 3 and henry is 32, has...
| 11-19-2007 | wallace4 | 1 | 11-19-2007 04:22 AM | need one of your tactics!!!
need one of your tactics!!!: having a mini crisis here at man utd...gr8 last...
| 02-13-2007 | Skinaldo | 1 | 02-13-2007 08:21 PM | tutoring
tutoring: what is the best way to have a player tutor...
| 02-11-2007 | sb1984 | 6 | 02-12-2007 04:46 AM | Can 4-3-3 be successful?
Can 4-3-3 be successful?: When you say successful what do you mean? Do you...
| 11-23-2006 | rashidi1 | 0 | 11-23-2006 03:08 AM | | » Online Users: 58 | | 0 members and 58 guests | | No Members online | | Most users ever online was 2,128, 07-21-2008 at 08:27 PM. | |