retired_kswansonwoolf

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by jcb23:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I think that in that case, the two Manchester teams would go into the Northern league. Two keep the numbers true, the most southerly member of the Northern league would be transferred into the Southern league.

I'm just speculating, that's the way it usually works, though I have no specific knowledge if thats the plan in this case. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Thanks, that would be my guess. Although I can imagine the recriminations if a club gets shifted from a weak Conf. North to a strong Conf. South or vice versa.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

What he said. I wouldn't like it one bit, if say i had a team in one regional division, improving its squad year after year, sizeing up the opponents, and then suddently be sent to an entirely different environment.

retired_solecito

Of course Burton happily switched when the opportunity presented itself to move into what they perceived (correctly as it turned out) easier Unibond League. It'll always be a problem for sides near the approximate border. But got to be better than large overlaps.

Still if SI can implement it it, I'd like the chance to manage Glossop (not quite their glory days now) or even New Mills. But Buxton would do at a pinch.

retired_corzawoodja

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Humph3:
Jcb, I think that in that case, the two Manchester teams would go into the Northern league. To keep the numbers true, the most southerly member of the Northern league would be transferred into the Southern league.

I'm just speculating, that's the way it usually works, though I have no specific knowledge if thats the plan in this case.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

yeh im pretty sure thats what would happen.

iv played a gaem or tow of CM in the Italian LLS and you see some clubs that hop around Seria c2 divisions every year! (Surely it must **** them off somewhat!)

retired_corzawoodja

i really cant see a reason why Si wont put Conference north and south into Football Manager.

Italy currently has 7 operating divisions in Cm, Brazil has about 20 and yet, England currently only has 5!

Please!!!!

retired_marcias

I understand the pyramid graphic. Who needs words? :p

retired_crazybonejr

I'd heard as low as it would go was Conference North/South, nothing below that. But that wouldn't be any lower than currently.

As for number of divisions, that's not really an accurate way to compare England to Italy with CM.

Italy currently has 4 levels represented in the game, England having 5. This won't change by using Conference North and South, just add another division, so to speak.

If you really want to compare detail, the database for English players and clubs is much more complete than any other country, and rightly so.

retired_sandra

Mmm...

Kidsgrove Athletic may end up in the Northern Premier League, so if Conference North & South does end up being including in FM05, then Kidsgrove Athletic may end up being a playable team. :thup:

Their ground used to be a high school pitch.

retired_solecito

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Guinness79:

Italy currently has 4 levels represented in the game, England having 5. This won't change by using Conference North and South, just add another division, so to speak.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
It will, Conference North and South will be at level six, the current Conference will remain at five.

retired_abejamaya98

[edit] This is not what we want to know. It an't player naming but it might as well be. Begone devil worshiper.

[This message was edited by Green Hornet on 24 February 2004 at 14:11.]

retired_sargent

I did not wish to know this.

And, I did not know of this before and I do now

[edited] Church. Unfortunatley you know mate, but others will be spared

[This message was edited by Green Hornet on 24 February 2004 at 14:13.]