retired_jamesdibby

As the title suggests which one should I go for, I've had a bid of 13mill accepted for Biglia and 20mill accepted for Johnson. This is for Villa in the second season.

retired_stoicky7

only had johnson and my experience of him is hes just ok. always gets rated 7. and never really excells any further, i think 20million is too much for him, i would pay no more than 9million. but maybe hes better than that and my tactics just dont suit him.

retired_abermea1441

Michael Johnson by a mile and perhaps another few mile.

retired_nicksgirl1206

I just sold M.Johnson for £13M + 50%... didn't seem that great, but hey I got him for free

retired_jamesdibby

I think it's gonna have to be Biglia now as I offered Man City 20mill which they negotiated to me, and now they say they want 44mill :eek: for him.

retired_stoicky7

how much is the boy lucas from liverpool? ive never went for him but have head good things

amrclutch1

Got Johnson 1st season with Blackburn as he requested a transfer - £5m, not bad.
Biglia is total class but you cant get a work permit at the start in England - then after a year or two he is just too expensive.

retired_aries

Yikes, alot of money for Biglia.

He has struggled for me. I feel he may suffer from a low pressure threshold as when I made him vice-captain, he was regularly averaging below 7 ratings and low morale, dispite my coaxing. He was consistently the worst performer in my strong, winning side. Ever Banega stepped in and was simply awesome.

In the end, I could'nt pick him up from his doldrums and sold him on.