steezebenboit

As the title suggests which one should I go for, I've had a bid of 13mill accepted for Biglia and 20mill accepted for Johnson. This is for Villa in the second season.

soapysouter

only had johnson and my experience of him is hes just ok. always gets rated 7. and never really excells any further, i think 20million is too much for him, i would pay no more than 9million. but maybe hes better than that and my tactics just dont suit him.

marcftm

Michael Johnson by a mile and perhaps another few mile.

teeyougee

I just sold M.Johnson for £13M + 50%... didn't seem that great, but hey I got him for free

steezebenboit

I think it's gonna have to be Biglia now as I offered Man City 20mill which they negotiated to me, and now they say they want 44mill :eek: for him.

soapysouter

how much is the boy lucas from liverpool? ive never went for him but have head good things

robchamp

Got Johnson 1st season with Blackburn as he requested a transfer - £5m, not bad.
Biglia is total class but you cant get a work permit at the start in England - then after a year or two he is just too expensive.

heathxxx

Yikes, alot of money for Biglia.

He has struggled for me. I feel he may suffer from a low pressure threshold as when I made him vice-captain, he was regularly averaging below 7 ratings and low morale, dispite my coaxing. He was consistently the worst performer in my strong, winning side. Ever Banega stepped in and was simply awesome.

In the end, I could'nt pick him up from his doldrums and sold him on.