If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by glamdring:
Well, as was discussed in another thread - why the need to rush?
Since I'm sitting watching numbers slowly trickle out onto my computer screen from experiments I'm a man of leisure for the moment :p<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
No need to rush, although there's a need to be non-committal.
I developed great skills in waffling, writing half a page when 2 lines will do when I did exams and wanted to make absolutely sure I included the answer in my waffle.
Now I'm on the other side of the fence, marking exams I hate people like me and just skim all the rubbish for the key words and ignore the extra!
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by iajafer:
He was scouted...only *...but scouted <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I have no doubt your scout found him, but would you have signed him if he were 1 star and a non-know player. :p
To reference another thread. This may be "taking the piss." Now, I'm off to take a piss..
I only loan players I scout and only sign players from other clubs I scout.
However I use player search to find uncontracted players as these seem to be ingnored by my scouts. I play with the "fog" on so usually they have little or no stats and then ask for a scout report prior to making a decision.
Do the more experienced LLMers have any views on this approach?