Is there a relationship between width and passing focus?

retired_cindymerc · 02-15-2007, 08:13 PM

ok.Thanks ill have a look

retired_kellyk · 02-16-2007, 04:09 AM

If you want to play down the flanks then you need to play with more width to get your wingers into play. If you want to play a more controlled game with short passing then you can go narrow and mixed

retired_cindymerc · 02-16-2007, 02:41 PM

Can I play with width away from home rashidi?I find that if im defensive away the computer eventually scores, so I want to be more attacking away which means using my wingers.

Thanks for answering question.

retired_cindymerc · 02-18-2007, 01:29 AM

I've now setled on playing short, narrow and mixed focus passing.It seems to work OK away from home ,as I hold the ball more.

retired_hope · 02-18-2007, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Found that playing wide works well with passing trough the middle.

If you want to play attacking a narrow play combines well with playing the flanks

Now I am really interested in this as I think you maybe onto something. Now the manual says that playing with with is complemented by focus passing down the flanks. I dont believe this is true I would agree with N'Kufo that playing narrow and down the flanks works, as does wide though the middle.

retired_dinalb · 02-19-2007, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by N'Kufo:

When you play narrow in my opinion it means that your team plays compact when they dont have the ball.

Width Has an effect only when you have the ball. When without the ball they will got narrow automatically no matter how wide you play. You can see it through the match.

Is there a relationship between width and passing focus?

It's no use having a squad full of star players without a decent way for them to play their football.

Is there a relationship between width and passing focus?