arcturus15

Does anyone think that the fan confidence on some of the subjects is a bit hard, especially coming down to signings and results.

I signed Ronnie Wallwork to provide cover in the center of midfield and after making about 4 substitute appearances, fans were unhappy believing him to be a bad signing. Same happened with Almeyda. He'll get a 6 or 7 rating every game but they kept saying he is another bad signing.

Then, the fans complain about my team losing 2-0 to Reading in the cup. They also think that a draw is a disappointing result in the leage against one of the better teams despite me being unbeaten in 15.

Seems a bit harsh to me.

Kain

It was ridiculously harsh before the first patch, no idea how it is after it. As Notts County, I lost in the League Cup to Southampton and the fans were unhappy for ages. A lot of people have reported the fans being unhappy about them signing young players who are obviously for the future, even if they signed them on free transfers.

Leroy1883

I think the main problem is that the calculation doesn't take into account for time on the pitch.

Substitues are likely to get lower than average ratings then player who start matches.

Therefore if time on the pitch was taken into account for subs the fan confidence would better reflect fan opinion.

gunnerfan

Also doesn't take into consideration how you intend to use the player, similar to scouting reports who claim a player isn't worthwhile signing when all you want is a warm body as a backup and you can't afford better.