If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
I want this letter to serve as an oasis of sanity in Sports interactive's desert of foolishness. You see, I truly believe that Sports interactive thrives on the victimization of others. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. In this letter, I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that Sports interactive has for a long time been arguing that there should be publicly financed centers of interdenominationalism. Had it instead been arguing that on this subject we get only a lot of blather and obfuscation from it and its subordinates, I might cede it its point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Sports interactive's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how it wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that the average working-class person can't see through Sports interactive's chicanery. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that it would be wrong to imply that Sports interactive is involved in some kind of conspiracy to mock, ridicule, deprecate, and objurgate people for their religious beliefs. It would be wrong because its campaigns are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but tyrannical half-wits often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Sports interactive enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever it threatens to force some to live by restrictive standards not applicable to others.
For your edification, I should point out that many of the people I've talked to have said that Sports interactive and its gofers should all be put up against a wall and given traitors' justice. Without commenting on that specifically I'd merely like to point out that many people are incredulous when I tell them that Sports interactive intends to make a mockery of our most fundamentally held beliefs. "How could Sports interactive be so odious?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is really possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Sports interactive plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that its double standards represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death. Sure, even shrewish kleptomaniacs may have some good points but I have yet to find one.
Every so often, Sports interactive tries giving rise to loud rumormongers. Whenever it gets caught doing so it raises a terrific hullabaloo calculated to create an atmosphere of mistrust in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. Remember, though, that just because I have one view of an issue and Sports interactive has a different view does not in itself mean that Sports interactive is a malicious charlatan and a stingy liar. But when Sports interactive says that some people deserve to feel safe while others do not, it's simply lying. That's why I aver that I can't make heads or tails of Sports interactive's pronouncements. I mean, does it want to do the entire country a grave disservice or doesn't it? Many people are convinced that Sports interactive's utterances have reached a depth of degeneracy that was virtually unknown in the past. I can't comment on that but I can say that I have no idea why it makes such a big fuss over anti-intellectualism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that if you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem.
Think about that for a moment. Sports interactive sees the world as somewhat anarchic, a game of catch-as-catch-can in which the sneakiest hoodwinkers nab the biggest prizes. It has been said that we might be able to explain away many of Sports interactive's dysfunctional, manipulative newsgroup postings as being merely the effect of bad drugs. I believe that to be true. I also believe that it is extremely discourteous. In fact, my handy-dandy Discourteous-O-Meter confirms that it is immature and stupid of Sports interactive to increase people's stress and aggression. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be, and that's why I say that some people think it's a bit extreme of me to love the Earth and everything that flowers and crawls upon it -- a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that Sports interactive recently got caught red-handed trying to exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in managing both the news and the entertainment that gets presented to us. Well, surprise, surprise, surprise, as Gomer Pyle would say.
And what about Sports interactive's idolators, who are legion? They, like Sports interactive, are stinking moral weaklings. Only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that Sports interactive's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Sports interactive's habitués, who loudly proclaim that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Regardless of those scary proclamations, the truth is that its criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, Sports interactive's criticisms are based solely on its emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in its "I think … I believe … I feel" game. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: Sports interactive has worn out its welcome.
My complaint about sports interactive! 
Linear Mode
