If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
Originally posted by eXistenZ:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by gavnoble:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by eXistenZ:
The problem is there are still nincompoops who deny them
And there are still nincompoops who look for things that don't even exist. They fall inbto the same stupid category as conspiracy theorists. </BLOCKQUOTE>
Look i wouldn't care if my opponent also needs 15 chances. But look at the facts. look at the screenshot! 1/19 versus 1/3. And you say their isn't a problem?
Please go back to the stupid hole you came from </BLOCKQUOTE>
Gavnoble has looked at the facts. Actually, he has compiled some statistics which I am sure you completely ignored in favour of using one example to prove your point.
01-12-2008, 06:38 PM
Si making a blatant attempt to deceive us? Post #42
Out of interest, how many people who experience a poor shot to goal ratio have gone back through the match report to look at all of the shots and see if there is a reason why so many are being missed? It is incredibly boring, but I found it worthwhile.
I have created one tactic that was seeing my team creating chances but not taking them, so I decided to go through the match reports and look at the shots I my players were having. It turned out many of the shots rushed, blocked or from poor positions. One thing I considered is that perhaps my high attacking mentallity was causing my players to shot on sight instead of trying to carve out a decent oppurtunity. As a result, I decided it may be better to to reduce my mentallity a bit. As a result, whiolst my team were creating fewer chances, they were of better quality, and more were going in.
I'm not going to say that there is no issue here (I am undecided as of yet) but surely it would make more sense to try and find a solution to the problem rather then to continually whinge about it?
01-12-2008, 06:46 PM
Si making a blatant attempt to deceive us? Post #44
The match engine is the problem, not the tactics. I set all my players "very rare" with distace shot. And still they do it. Also every one-on-one turns out to be pointless.
01-12-2008, 06:49 PM
Si making a blatant attempt to deceive us? Post #45
Originally posted by gavnoble:
Obviously I must be, after all I keep looking at the same stupid comments about problems that do not exist.
Try going away and looking at some stats from real life football matches, compare the goals to shot ratios and then come back and tell me if there is a problem. The results will surprise you but of course this would involve you actually making some sort of effort on your part, which I doubt you actually want to do because you don't wish to be proved wrong.
You are wasting your time, as the boy is obviously half-witted. Earlier on in the thread he was telling us how he had to reload every game if the result didn't match what he perceived as matching his world class mangerial skills.
01-12-2008, 06:50 PM
Si making a blatant attempt to deceive us? Post #46
Originally posted by YOUNGSTEVE:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by gavnoble:
Obviously I must be, after all I keep looking at the same stupid comments about problems that do not exist.
Try going away and looking at some stats from real life football matches, compare the goals to shot ratios and then come back and tell me if there is a problem. The results will surprise you but of course this would involve you actually making some sort of effort on your part, which I doubt you actually want to do because you don't wish to be proved wrong.
You are wasting your time, as the boy is obviously half-witted. Earlier on in the thread he was telling us how he had to reload every game if the result didn't match what he perceived as matching his world class mangerial skills. </BLOCKQUOTE>
What does manager skill matters if the match engine is completly screwed?
01-12-2008, 06:51 PM
Si making a blatant attempt to deceive us? Post #47
Originally posted by eXistenZ:
I can't give an accurate percentage, that's why i said 40-50%. But cut the bullshit and look at the real problem!
Don't be an arse. :thdn: You've given a few isolated examples of your percentages but have provided absolutely NOTHING to say that these figures are indicative of what happens usually. So maybe it's you who should cut the BS and start providing some evidence to back it up?
01-12-2008, 06:53 PM
Si making a blatant attempt to deceive us? Post #48
Originally posted by eXistenZ:
The match engine is the problem, not the tactics. I set all my players "very rare" with distace shot. And still they do it. Also every one-on-one turns out to be pointless.
How much creative freedom do these players have? Do any players have "tries long shots" as a PPM?
01-12-2008, 06:54 PM
Si making a blatant attempt to deceive us? Post #49
Originally posted by GillsMan:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by eXistenZ:
I can't give an accurate percentage, that's why i said 40-50%. But cut the bullshit and look at the real problem!
Don't be an arse. :thdn: You've given a few isolated examples of your percentages but have provided absolutely NOTHING to say that these figures are indicative of what happens usually. So maybe it's you who should cut the BS and start providing some evidence to back it up? </BLOCKQUOTE>
Like i said: i'm tired of taking a screenshot of every match, because there are some idiots here who are paid by SI to proclaime "there is nothing wrong with the match engine"
Why should i put effort in prooving something everyone with common sense knows already
01-12-2008, 07:02 PM
Si making a blatant attempt to deceive us? Post #50