rytm2323

As I pointed out in this thread, there's not a great deal of difference between what we're seeing in FM, and what we see IRL. Take a look at the comparisons between FM stats (both manager-controlled and AI controlled) and IRL stats).

rytm2323

Sorry, this thread: Too many shots / Goals to shots ratio problems - is it just a myth? Stats inside...

beachjunie1015

Mate...I find it funny that you're defending a match engine you admit not to know anything about...

retired_ehoff15

Mate...I find it funny that you're defending a match engine you admit not to know anything about... </BLOCKQUOTE>

because it's the same crap every year from the SI-Bashing gang. EVer since I visited this forum, there are people who complain their strikers don't score enough. As Gav said, they only ever complain if it's against them. I never heard of anyone come here to moan they won a game even though they only have one shot and the other team has 40.

As for the comment about "it doesn't happen that often in real life". Yes it does. More often than people think. But they wouldnt know because all they watch is highlight football where Rooney score a goal from every one or two shot

retired_imac4pat

I don't think there are too many shots, rather that the game creates an unrealistic number of 1-on-1 chances (much more than in real life). Because there are normally not too many of these in real life in each match, a lot of these aren't scored in the game so as to keep the scorelines from becoming too large.

It's always frustrating for me if my strikers blow a large number of 1-on-1 chances in my games, but then I just remember that in real life they wouldn't have so many of these chances anyway (but it is always fun when I have a string of 2-0/3-0 victories and the opposing goalkeeper is the MoM). I hope for this to be sorted out in next update/patch.

retired_vocostoner311

I could bet again that as the date seems to be April 2008 and the team is AC Milan some who has even a slight clue about football could think that maybe in their best day those strikers could score at least a couple of "lucky" goals...

But on the another hand I'd say that Kaka, Inzaghi and Ronaldo to begin with are sold or injured and therefore they lack that composure and ability to score. Not to mention those suckable other attackers like Gilardino and Pato. So it's pretty obvious that he just doesn't have the players and resources to cut it... </BLOCKQUOTE>

I would agree with you, but i made Milan better in the database so it is not really an issue. Also Gilardini is good enough for Milan in that way. Also i use the real-time editor to fix the dropping mental stats, because it is unrealistic.

So it are not the players, it's the complet ****ed up, prehistorical, screwed match engine

retired_vocostoner311

Please people open your eyes and see what the problem is. SI is already letting us wait until Fevruary, the last thing we need now are some nincompoops who say "it are your players, it's your tactics"

retired_vocostoner311

I could bet again that as the date seems to be April 2008 and the team is AC Milan some who has even a slight clue about football could think that maybe in their best day those strikers could score at least a couple of "lucky" goals...

But on the another hand I'd say that Kaka, Inzaghi and Ronaldo to begin with are sold or injured and therefore they lack that composure and ability to score. Not to mention those suckable other attackers like Gilardino and Pato. So it's pretty obvious that he just doesn't have the players and resources to cut it... </BLOCKQUOTE>

Another thing: All m ycoaches say in their rapports: "would be a star-player with every Serie A-club". What idiotic explanaition are you giving there?

Even if their rating is not ultimate good, how do you explain that a lot of minor teams (parma, sampdoria livorno) get a score percentage of about 40-50%? while my team can't even reach 5%. It's time you cut your crap. If you can't say anything that makes sense, just **** off

rytm2323

Are those percentages accurate, or have you just made them up?

retired_vocostoner311

Are those percentages accurate, or have you just made them up? </BLOCKQUOTE>

Look at my posted screenshot. i got 1/19= 6%
Real got 1/3= 33%.
But against minor teams they just need one-two chances and they score.

I can't give an accurate percentage, that's why i said 40-50%. But cut the bullshit and look at the real problem!