If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
i find short passing game completly uneffective on 2008. even when giving my defense very little creative freedom they still go for many long passes. I know Im doing smth wrong. could it be becouse I set time wasting to none?
direct is far more smoother.
Am still early in the season but playing mixed passing. dont normally do that, prefer to play one particular style. Working well so far though. 1 draw and 6 wins, including beating MAn u 4-1. Still early though.
Mixed. I play a counter attacking 4-4-2 and nothing thrills me more than watching my team suck in the opposition, steal the ball, then bang one to the flanks behind their fullback.
I have yet to see a proper short passing tactic though, people have long been trying to make a consistent Arsenal-style fluid possession football tactic for years, it's like the Holy Grail of FM.
I have yet to see a proper short passing tactic though, people have long been trying to make a consistent Arsenal-style fluid possession football tactic for years, it's like the Holy Grail of FM.[/QUOTE]
:thup:
as I see short and quick your defense will play only long balls. team passing wont be over 60%.
if you put arsenal style into FM lenguage I realy believe they would play direct/quick/counter but just with difference rheir passing will go to the ground.
I believe when trying to adopt short passing must go for a lot run with ball, lot creative freedom and throuh balls...didnt tryied it yet but certenly will