If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
I've been training younsters in new positions since they "born" in my club, but i've noticed that when i stop training him they lose the ability in the position.
Appart that this don't make any sense (if they lose in the new ones, why don't they lose in the ones that came with the game if they are not played there?) is there any point in training that they don't decrease their ability?
If left back is their " natural" position, the will not lose their appetite, determination and skill to play their. Why? because, they were brought up playing that position etc.
In retrospects to retraining positions, if you are trying to train that " natural" left back to play left wing, he will have to get used to playing that position, adapt to it etc. If he then stops being trained in that position, he forgets how to play their.
i have many players going from 1 to 18 in a position ability (with training and matches), but once i take them the training, they decline even faster than they climb up.
My question is if there is any way that they don't decrease the new position ability if i take them the training.
Versatile players who play a position and train it for a number of years may keep it, but in my experience this is very few, very young, very versatile players.
I never re-train to more than one position any more - I just keep them trained on the "new" position and keep it at that.
I agree with NTFC's assessment of the training model in the first reply, if not his use of "retrospect" and "their".