If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
Valid, Phil, but not necessarily true. It's a fairly safe bet that most of the teams you played had more multi-million valued superstars in their squad than you, I'd have thought. Which would be reflected in the AI assessment of the team strength.
(FWIW, I do think reputation is a more likely answer, but I think it's an interesting debate).
Originally posted by jcb23:
Valid, Phil, but not necessarily true. It's a fairly safe bet that most of the teams you played had more multi-million valued superstars in their squad than you, I'd have thought. Which would be reflected in the AI assessment of the team strength.
(FWIW, I do think reputation is a more likely answer, but I think it's an interesting debate).
Fair point actually. Some of my players may have been of a similar ability, but their values were a lot less. My highest was probably about £300k, which obviously paled into comparison with most of the others.
Its a pity I didnt bet a weeks wages on my Limerick team as we ended up winning the league.I would have been able to retire after one season of management!
Originally posted by StockportLamb:
Its a pity I didnt bet a weeks wages on my Limerick team as we ended up winning the league.I would have been able to retire after one season of management!
I used to play a footie management game AGES back that let you bet on the outcomes of your games. No surer way of getting a few extra quid than to 'somehow' lose a game you were odds-on to win.
I meant my fictional weeks wages as I dont actually manage Limerick(it would be cool though although Id probably get stabbed on my way to our first match.."they dont call it stab city for nothing").....FM isnt real life.
Linear Mode
