MixitupMixitdictator

always chose large db imo

McDoul

Core 2 Duo E6850
4GB Corsair XMS2 Pro DHT Quad
RAID0 Striped WD2500Y 250GB x 2
Vista 64 Ultimate

You must be doing something wrong, either that or have very poorly configured PC's.

All English Divisions
Medium Database
No Transfer Budgets
All comps to Maximum
Unemployed
On Holiday until August 31st....

3mins 34 seconds...

Proper setup and config the way to go it would seem.

McDoul

Something seriously slow going on there. What timings are your RAM running at?

Juhuli

I really doubt that result. Just tested again this time using minimum detail on everything, and the result was 2m 38s.

McDoul

I really doubt that result. Just tested again this time using minimum detail on everything, and the result was 2m 38s. </BLOCKQUOTE>

Why doubt it?

You set the guidelines?

You've only got 2GB of 667, I'm running 4GB of matched Quad 800 @ 834.

Incidentally, that was with DDT's for about 12000 extra players.

DJdeMarco

AMD Athlon X2 3800+ (2.01 ghz)
2 GB DDR2 667
HD Seagate IDE 7200RPM
Windows Vista Ultimate

My time:
18 min. 26 sec.

Juhuli

Because there's no way you are running this test in 3 mins. if you have all details set to maximum. No way.

And besides you have dual-core which roughly takes twice the time to calculate a match in full-detail, if I have understand the threading used in FM correctly.

RICO

Quad 2.40ghz with 2gb ram

22 mins 7 sec

VonBlade

Actually this is an inaccurate benchmark. What you really should test is the time between setting the game up and being able to add a manager.

If you test the time between starting unemployed and six weeks later, you're introducing a ton of variables with players moving to teams and other stuff. Whereas a pure db load and setup (about 3 countries) has the same overheads on everyones version.
VB

Legends Wear 7

00:11:30.841

Q6600 Quad @2.4ghz
4gb PC-6400 RAM 4-4-4-12
500gb SATAII 7200RPM
Vista Ultimate 64bit

No-way can i believe 3mins on McDoul's setup.