retired_tommy846lv

Seperate training for DF/MD/AT?
Is it better or mostly the same?

for example :
I make a DF schedule with:

Strenght : High

Aerobic : High (Can someone explain if the aerobics are also for heading and so on, or
only GK, please)

Tactics : Medium
Ball Control : Light
Defending : High (should I make Intense?)
Attacking : light
Shooting : Light
Set pieces : High

This makes a Medium Workload.

What do you guys think about it?

Should I tweak a little to make HARD worklad or always try and keep medium?

PS

I train my AM R/L as attackers.

retired_larson_luck

I put set-pieces to light (almost none) for my CBs, light/medium for FBs. Heading comes under ball control, so this should be medium at least.

retired_karvai

i also would put attackin 2 medium at least cuz u would want your midfielder with good passing attribute

retired_BrownVanilla

1st of all keep your training on medium worload overall do not ever put it on heavy overall.

As for the aerobic's thing: this covers areas like pace, accelaration, jumping.

Heading is covered in ball control