If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
So how come in a previous edition of either this or CM, I forget which, Everton moved to a shiny new ground at the King's Dock after a few years but there is no mention of Kirkby in this game? While there is still plenty to do on the matter it's at least as done as King's Dock ever was.
1) I've learnt from Kings Dock. If its Everton, believe it when it happens.
2) I'd sooner move us to ( back to ) Anfield in the game than move us to Kirkby. No offence against Kirkby of course, its just I dont personally believe in clubs moving out to city suburbs.
Originally posted by PaulC:
1) I've learnt from Kings Dock. If its Everton, believe it when it happens.
2) I'd sooner move us to ( back to ) Anfield in the game than move us to Kirkby. No offence against Kirkby of course, its just I dont personally believe in clubs moving out to city suburbs.
Paul
Agreed, it's Everton, only believe it when it's signed sealed and delivered. (see manny fernandes for example)
Originally posted by PaulC:
1) I've learnt from Kings Dock. If its Everton, believe it when it happens.
2) I'd sooner move us to ( back to ) Anfield in the game than move us to Kirkby. No offence against Kirkby of course, its just I dont personally believe in clubs moving out to city suburbs.
Paul
I agree with you Paul and I was against the move. Just thought it odd that in similar circumstances in a previous game a potential move was recognised but this time not.
Originally posted by PaulC:
1) I've learnt from Kings Dock. If its Everton, believe it when it happens.
2) I'd sooner move us to ( back to ) Anfield in the game than move us to Kirkby. No offence against Kirkby of course, its just I dont personally believe in clubs moving out to city suburbs.