If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
I get very confused by the training schedules, so all I do when I start a game is just auto assign all my coaches and leave them to it, without changing anything on the schedule,and I still get decent results. So with this in mind does it really make that much difference?
I'm on my forth season with Man City doing really well just setting training on auto, I do make sure I have top coaches, maybe it makes some difference but I don't really understand it either, doing well either way.
I have found it hard to see the impact myself. I think it can boost a player. Almost feel like it is more the negative effects of no or bad training that you want to avoid.
I dont think it matters, unless you want to see green arrows and red arrows on your players screen. When you look closer it doesnt make a big difference to the attributes unless they are young players who improve naturally anyway.
it is important if you want to perfect a young player to a particular position, e.g. no shooting/setpiece training for CB's so can train twice as much on defending. Can have effect on older players too (I drastically improved a 30yo striker by concentrating on finishing and ball control).
Training definitely has an effect and is certainly useful.
A players attributes will increase as he moves through his teens and into his early 20's (unless he's not training at all) and if he's on the default training all attributes will increase by pretty much the same amount.
Now, the amount they increase will depend on the players CA (Current Ability) and PA (Potential Ability). If a player has a fairly big difference between his PA and CA, and he's relayively young, then it's likely that if you have good training facilities and 4 to 5 star coaching across the board then his attributes are going to improve a fair bit.
So what training schedules you set up are going to determine how this incease in attributes is spread. As I said earlier, if you just stick with the default schedule your players attributes will all increase a bit. So if you have a young defender with tackling and marking of 15 and shooting and finishing of 6, he could end up having tackling and marking of 17 and shooting and finishing of 8 or 9.
But if the same player is in a training schedule that is more biased towards defensive training then he could end up with tackling and marking attributes of 19/20and his shooting and finishing attributes (which a defender doesn't need) will stay the same.
Originally posted by chopper99:
Training definitely has an effect and is certainly useful.
A players attributes will increase as he moves through his teens and into his early 20's (unless he's not training at all) and if he's on the default training all attributes will increase by pretty much the same amount.
Now, the amount they increase will depend on the players CA (Current Ability) and PA (Potential Ability). If a player has a fairly big difference between his PA and CA, and he's relayively young, then it's likely that if you have good training facilities and 4 to 5 star coaching across the board then his attributes are going to improve a fair bit.
So what training schedules you set up are going to determine how this incease in attributes is spread. As I said earlier, if you just stick with the default schedule your players attributes will all increase a bit. So if you have a young defender with tackling and marking of 15 and shooting and finishing of 6, he could end up having tackling and marking of 17 and shooting and finishing of 8 or 9.
But if the same player is in a training schedule that is more biased towards defensive training then he could end up with tackling and marking attributes of 19/20and his shooting and finishing attributes (which a defender doesn't need) will stay the same.