retired_duncan

Heard of him or not, why would a manager of a conf regional side want to know about him?

Please tell me you understand why the name was taken out of the title. Because if you don't you should wander back to GQ or wherever it is you came from, post-haste.

retired_sandra

Enjoy your long visit to GPG today did you?

You need to understand the ethics of LLM if you wish to consider yourself so.

KingsbayYHPE

Consider your record expunged, Simon

retired_crazybonejr

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned that the use of real life knowledge isn't acceptable in here. You go into the game as a nobody, and for realism in here, we go in knowing nobody.

retired_sandra

Thank you Ian. Only a day late.

KingsbayYHPE

A guy pointed out the original Warning was dated 16/12/2007

retired_sandra

It was. I was seeing if you or Pete noticed.

retired_ngrundman

Sometimes we come out knowing nobody as well. Like my Workington scout. I'm sure he's a hermit.

KingsbayYHPE

I skimmed your post, alt-man, and I thought you said your scout was a "helmet".

If that had been the case he'd have been the same as mine

retired_hbjohns

So you can't try LLM if you've ever posted in GQ or GPTG no matter what it is you post (the post I made yesterday was to tell someone to figure out the best players themself). All I tried to do was see how you guys played, so I at least gave it a chance before labelling you loons like most people outside of llm. But yeah the reward:effort:abuse ratio is way too inbalanced. But that's not my problem.

Where did I say I was going to use real life knowledge?

My thread title was a piece of irony (obviously a bit too subtle :/) playing on the fact many people who post here don't actually read the rules, and selecting an appropriate player to do this with.