Quote:
Originally posted by Glyn:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Nostromo:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Glyn:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by DS:
Any company can pay dividends. If 1 person owns the company they can take out as much money as they want from the company because its there company.
|
Exactly. Abramovich owns Chelsea because he owns the shares in Chelsea. Therefore, he's a shareholder that dividends are paid to.
And for Nostromo - as for only plcs paying dividends...how exactly are the investors in non-plcs supposed to get a return on their investment if not through dividend payments? </BLOCKQUOTE>
isn't the role of the moderator is to moderate? i don't recall 'attitude' being part of the jd. but thanks for the feedback anyway.
but since you made such an intelligent point, why didnt watford pay shareholders dividend...or man city?
please dream up something on that and share it with us
thanks in advance </BLOCKQUOTE>
Attitude? Where did you dream that up from? Do you actually read a straightforward question (which you haven't bothered to answer, btw) in your own head with the type of attitude
you would ask it (ie the same sort of attitude that comes out with 'but since you made such an intelligent point')?
As for 'why didnt watford pay shareholders dividend...or man city?', for a start, I don't know whether you're talking about in-game or IRL, but in either case, as has been pointed out above, but even if a company has made the profits to enable them to make a profit, it doesn't mean that they
have to make dividend payments - profit can always be ploughed back into a company for invest purposes etc. And that isn't 'dreamt up', but I have shared it with you.
As for 'isn't the role of the moderator is to moderate?'. Yes it is. But it doesn't mean that I can't also post in the same way as any other forum user.
In return, perhaps I can ask a similar question of you - isn't it the role of forum users to adhere to the House Rules and also the Terms And Conditions you agreed to when joining the forums that state you shouldn't be abusive to other users? Please dream up something on that and share it with us.
Thanks in advance. </BLOCKQUOTE>
First of all, i was talking about the game, not real life.
As you are aware, and im sure you are as you seem to read some of the postings...the game is far from being realistic.
Obviously, you are doing the dreaming....where did I abuse you? Pointing out the obvious is not abuse, it maybe annoying for you but its not abuse.
Maybe, you should try to be less sensitive. No, this is not abuse either. Just advice.
Actually you are wrong. The moderator's purpose is to moderate in an impartial manner.
I don't see you doing that. In fact, you feel compelled to inflame the situation by 'clever' at the end of your post.
Thanks for trying to get 'heavy' on me, its quite funny. Especially, your intention behind it.
You get critised, (once again pointing out the difference between abuse and citicism), and insted of dealing with it, you respond in a manner hoping to gain sympathy from the rest of the posters.
Fascinating stuff. Wonder what Freud would say about that. The need for justification must be strong.