retired_recca

Anyone had the misfortune to play this fixture?

QPR play in their away kit which results in all twenty outfield players and both halves of the possession bar being exactly the same shade of red.

Which makes me think:

1. Why do QPR play in their away kit?
2. Shouldn't we have a third kit in case of emergencies?
3. I wish this match would end much quicker.
4. Is this a problem with any other teams?

retired_laurenhill

This also happens for Sheffutd vs Southampton

thatonegirl1012

Playing as Southampton this as happened to be numberous times. For example against Sheffield United, Stoke City, Sunderland and several more that I can not remember. This happened regardless of who was home or away. Another promblem I found was that my third kit was worn once in nearly 4 seasons. Despite it being a much better choice than my away kit on countless of ocassions.

retired_badmagic9

Posting and You

Southampton's kit problems is a known and logged bug.

retired_myu94070

there's always one.

I'm managing QPR at the moment and the Southampton games were a schamozzle, I had no idea what was going on at times.

Glad to see the bug has been logged, maybe one day they can get around to fixing it. I gather we will be waiting until February so the pimpley faced 14 year olds majority can have their updated DB with the new patch, some of us don't care about DB updates and would just like some things fixed. :p

Sarah

Also happens for Sheff Wed and Everton but no-one responded when I posted it in the bugs forum.

retired_TheSailor

Had one QPR game where I wore away kit at home, cant remember who against. These sort of bugs really tarnish the game, can understand lots of intricate game play bugs - complicated program, thats life, but a kit clash?, a 14 yr old on a BBCB (if-then loops, remember those?) could sort that out....but loving the game, these things are just annoying, thats all.

retired_recca

If it's been dealt with, great.

And Troyer - it's not neccesarily to insult people.

retired_badmagic9

Not insulting, per se ... just pointing out that you could have answered your question without anyone else's help, with a simple Search.

There are far too many unneeded threads on this (and many other, to be fair) boards, and the primary reason for that is people lacking simple "netiquette", either through ignorance or laziness, to use the Search function before they post.

I will grant, though, this antiquated BBS's search function leaves much to be desired.

retired_badmagic9

dola, sorry ...

And just because it's been logged doesn't mean it's been dealt with. Just that it's in the bug reporting system, has a priority assigned to it (I don't know what that priority might be in the case), and that it will be dealt with in due course.

From past experience with SI's bug database, if it's a low prioity, it may take a while...