If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
despite having won the league with aberdeen 10 years in a row in one of my games, and having 100 million in the transfer kitty, and having won the champions league 5 times etc, why does my club still only worth the same as dundee utd and motherwell (just under 30 million), hearts and hibs who havent won anything in my game for 15 years are worth more, even though there in debt and get half my current 37000 crowds
ha, kilmarnock who have been relegated for 10 years have just been promoted and are worth only 500k less than me, despite me being about 5 billion pounds in assets better off
my players are all world class and id get about 200 million for them all, im 100 million transfer kitty, get 37000 crowds etc, its a load of bollox, overlooked mathematical nonsense from si
i think sigames have introduced a mathematical threshold to all the teams in the game, for instance, celtic , despite winning nothing for about 10 years are worth more than they were at the start of the game, its almost as if the reputation at the start of the game is only variable by tiny amounts, if so, it needs altering as all teams can fall by the wayside, just look at leeds, forest etc, sigames are simply not allowing old clubs to die off and new ones to emerge, thats why i get the feeling that if i won the league with aberdeen for the next 600 years, celtic would still have a higher reputation in the game, its a nonsense
Club Value Bug 
despite having won the league with aberdeen 10 years in a row in one of my games, and having 100 million in the transfer kitty, and having won the champions league 5 times etc, why does my club still only worth the same as dundee utd and motherwell (just under 30 million), hearts and hibs who havent won anything in my game for 15 years are worth more, even though there in debt and get half my current 37000 crowds
Linear Mode
