pebbles

i have wondered for ages now weather or not wen settin trainig if its best to set def, mid and att all seperate training schedules or do u guys have the full squad on 1 schedule!? i kinda prefer the seperate ones but not sure if its for the best

retired_zonnicka

Training makes very little (if any?) difference to your team.

Don't waste your time.

mayed111

I always start out with a GK, DC, MC, ST regimes (will put AM's in the ST regime) then over course of time have custom regimes for certain players. For example I might have a regime for a couple bench players that has higher str/aer training than the regulars

retired_rdhertsel

Nonsense.. dont speak of, what you clearly dont know anything about!

If only people paid enough attention to the training, then we could perhaps have 40% less threads about "I'm not winning!!"..

pebbles

yh i defo think it makes a difference! just wondering wat way i should be doin it! take it theres no right or wrong really

retired_rdhertsel

I usually have schedules for:

GK
DEF
DEF MID
ATT MID
WINGERS
STRIKERS

tnyorkiemom

Well depends on what formation i play and what qualities my players have.
But if i play a flat 442 and i just want my defenders to defend, they just have their own "defenders" scheduel.
But most of times i have:
GK
D R/L
D C
DM C
M R/L
AM C
FS (Fast striker)
SS (Strong striker or target man)
SP (Set pieces) I always have my freekick cornor man on a scheduel for him self so he have intensive in set pieces

retired_vern918

I have a pre-season training schedule, high on aerobics and lower on specific skills.

Then during the season I have sep schedules for Def/Mid/Str

Despite what Asimo says I think they work well, as after a few months of them the training feedback gives you info that ties in with your schedule, e.g. a striker will have improved his shooting, but his defensive skills may have eased, or a defender has improved tacking, but his finishing has got worse.

:thup: