retired_tinkfaeree

1.) You can't use a comparative with "correct". Something is either correct or not.

2.) He did not complain about your grammar but about orthographical mistakes.

retired_jaipoetic

Yes. I agree. Sometimes a lot.

retired_fitnessguruhealthnut

I always thought "correct" was something that could be partial, but "true" was something that is not malleable.

arman920

There might be degrees of right and wrong, there are no degrees of correct.

Equate correct and incorrect with dead and alive and you won't go wrong.

retired_pmetzger1

I wasn't really having a go at how your post was written; more the fact that you have the temerity to criticise the English of someone for who it is not a first language when your illiteracy is spread across a number of threads.

KingsbayYHPE

Or LLM and non-LLM.

retired_fitnessguruhealthnut

In a maths problem you could have parts that are correct and parts that are not, same as a logical structure.

To me "correct" can be both, but I'm a philosopher so language is all pretty strange to me.

retired_crazybonejr

Fixed your post. But I agree, there's a lot of that going on lately.

And am I the only one, other than Ian anyway, who realizes that Wisla Krakow is Poland's largest club?

retired_crazybonejr

Of course the post would be fixed if I wasn't such a numpty.

retired_tinkfaeree

I noticed that too but I couldn't be bothered to complain about that and give that idiot even more credit than he deserves.