If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
Its becoming quickly apparent to me that player ratings have been toned down and wondering if an average performance is now a 6 rather than a 7.
I've always wondered about this however because as we know FM uses a 1-10 scale so you'd think to utilise this scale properly a player who 'dosen't play particularly well but dosen't play badly' would score a 5. Does this not make sense to anyone else??
Also match ratings should be relative to your opposition, for example if say Swindon play Man U in the cup and lose 3-0 there players could still of played really well for there normal standards, what do you think.
Originally posted by Van Macintosh:
Also match ratings should be relative to your opposition, for example if say Swindon play Man U in the cup and lose 3-0 there players could still of played really well for there normal standards, what do you think.
I agree with that. As in, the best sprinter from New Caledonia running 100m in 13.55 and having the run of his life, not to mention breaking a national record.
Ratings?? Is 6 the new 7?? 
Linear Mode
