retired_prettygirl9156

according to a Cambridge Utd fan on Confguide:

retired_shalurana

Their chairman is a complete *****. Last year at the trophy semi at their place he wanted to squeeze 1200 Stevenage fans into a standing area suitable for about 600. He is on record for saying squeeze them all in there but in more explicit terms.

All this cos we have their manager :cool:

4-2 loss tonight though :thdn:

retired_Fit

What a great response

retired_Fit

Were their police at the game ? Hell of alot of witnesses. Police have stuck their noses into on pitch violence in the past.

marynot

their grounds a nice shade of blue tbf, and the tannoy system comes courtesy of South West Trains.

retired_alexpf

The ground has the right name to be fair the REC.

The chairman apologized about the fan thing as well start of the season.

My_Evo

The official site report has nothing to do with the club itself as far as I understand.

And the comment from Grays is entirely non-commital and the littlest they could get away with. It shows no sense of responsibility, so nullifies nothing.


The York players were sent off for a) being the last man and b) an alleged stamp (which isn't the same thing, so don't even waste my time)

retired_kris10nicole

When i saw who the thread starter was, i thought this would be an interesting thread, as it's not often you hear about football teams who support creationism.

retired_MikeMcC

The official site report has nothing to do with the club itself as far as I understand.

And the comment from Grays is entirely non-commital and the littlest they could get away with. It shows no sense of responsibility, so nullifies nothing.


The York players were sent off for a) being the last man and b) an alleged stamp (which isn't the same thing, so don't even waste my time) </BLOCKQUOTE>

Well I would guess that the club would at the least have to approve what is put on the website, so they would'nt approve anything they didn't agree with.

Why would the club have to apologise/feel responsible for the incident ( I'm talking about all incidents like this tbh, not just this one ) It was the player who commited the foul, not the club, perhaps the club should encourage/force the player to make a public apology, but not apologise themselves.

Although this seems to be a particularly bad foul ( I havnt seen it but since there is a fair amount of fuss about it, that would seem to be the case ) a stamp ( imo ) is just as bad as an elbow.

If there is legal action in the works, I could see Grays lawyers ( if they have some ) advising them to say as little as possible?

retired_lnspeer

One of my favourite awaydays Grays