retired_civilian888

You've been teaching those Mexicans how to use the Editor haven't you

retired_DonWon

Another perk is of course adding family members as youth players.

retired_stesska

Never had that until once earlier this year, though obviously researchers of the big clubs get a lot more criticism, Rangers and Celtic fans are usually the worst.

A friend of an u16 player asked why he wasn't in the game/would he be in the data update. He then got quite a bit of detail about him, and also a few bits on another player who the first player is friends with.

Helped quite a bit as I can't get to reserve/youth matches.

mrfunktastick

im shy

retired_Pantora

Luton squad ths year will mainly have been rated by other researchers because of Blackwell's signing spree this summer

best FM research decision was giving Curtis Davies a -8 potential after the league 1 winnig season and then seeing him go on to be a 10 million pound player :cool:

retired_DonWon

Random number generator (between 18 and 20)

retired_princess160

FS joking around does put the question to mind: teams will usually be researched by fans of those teams. How to stop bias? And is one researchers pace 18 as fast as the next ones? How does SI manage to cover entire continents and remain consistent?

Fascinating stuff :cool:

This thread is hovering on the edge of satanism for a LLM though

mrfunktastick

i don't think senegal is joking though

retired_gitfresh

The lovely Pete and Dean, the English Head Researchers, see to that.

mrfunktastick

The lovely Pete and Dean, the English Head Researchers, see to that. </BLOCKQUOTE>

if all researchers were biased by the same amount it wouldn't be a problem