retired_barbie34

I hadn't thought of that Zaitsev, seems fair enough

retired_steve777

Febian Brandy. :cool:

prof101

Scotty is clearly better than Carroll, ffs. Stop being a biased barcode funt. </BLOCKQUOTE>

You could be right, just being a biased barcode I've seen more of Sinclair. </BLOCKQUOTE>

AGH!! NO NO NO!! I meant I've seen more of CARROLL </BLOCKQUOTE>

Andy has the potential! Needs to bulk up a bit to be suitable for the prem but his height and finishing are his great assets!

retired_kkaigle

It's because they're symmetrical. Most old stadiums, or those gradually redeveloped remain assymmetrical which apparently adds character.

Much fun going on in the Everton stadium debate because it apparently looks like a lower league new stadium writ large. </BLOCKQUOTE>

My point exactly. All the new stadiums have vastly better facilities but I just found something charming about assymmetrical designs. For new stadia/redeveloped stadia, St James Park and the Stadium of Light are beacons for design in my opinion. Hell, I'm even warming to Liverpool's after the initial shock of moving from Anfield.

The Emirates, Darlington Arena, Riverside et al have no character whatsoever - they look like friggin' shopping centres.