retired_jessicadon

IN at front, OUT at back.

Generally wearage for cnuts. </BLOCKQUOTE>

Right, sounds cunty as you say.

retired_gulkis

i'd take half and half to mean a loose sort of tuck rather than fully tucked in, so there's a slight overhang. but who knows, perhaps it's a technical term?

retired_olechka

tucked in is the general rule here now unless you're at the bottom of the social ladder where out is still okay it seems. I still have some shirts that look better out, white shirts for example.

This is wrong I think. Straight bottom shirts are designed by the manufacturer to be tucked in, mostly into slacks. Shirts with the curved ends (name eludes me) are generally made to be work out, over jeans mostly.

retired_mika318

Sort of a shirt pelmet to hide the unspeakable waistline if you will.

Geoff

This is wrong I think. Straight bottom shirts are designed by the manufacturer to be tucked in, mostly into slacks. Shirts with the curved ends (name eludes me) are generally made to be work out, over jeans mostly. </BLOCKQUOTE>

you could not BE more wrong!

the longer tail (for the gentleman sir) is designed EXACTLY so that it it remains FIRMLY tucked in, regardless of how long you sit/stand/walk.

the square hem cut is is designed for men with a slim/average build so that the drape means both front and back of the shirt are an equal height/parallel to the ground.

retired_olechka

sorry, im not talking about the ones with the longer tail at the back. I'm talking about the curved ones that front and back are the same length.

retired_dawn12302

Tails are tails. Where's the difficulty here ?

retired_olechka

Im not talking about tails, i'm talking about a curved hem.

You get shirts where the back is longer than the front. Im not talking about them at all.

allygator

I thought this is what was meant by half n half clicky

retired_foxden

men tucked in?
women loose?