retired_smbowens

The secterian singing at the Inter Milan game broadcast beautifully by STV- what was the outcome?

retired_bec8643

The secterian singing at the Inter Milan game broadcast beautifully by STV- what was the outcome? </BLOCKQUOTE>

Because singing is exactly same as throwing missiles onto the pitch

retired_oldfierce

More important to UEFA these days it seems.

retired_smbowens

The secterian singing at the Inter Milan game broadcast beautifully by STV- what was the outcome? </BLOCKQUOTE>

Because singing is exactly same as throwing missiles onto the pitch </BLOCKQUOTE>

Did I say it was?

retired_brat7

the back of the Sun was almost vomit inducing today, apparently "European top stars" want Celtic to get the win (which they should anyway) those European top stars? John Robertson and Johan Mjallby :cool:

although they said 70,000 were in Seville? I thought it was 7 million or even higher, Celtic won the UEFA fair play thing for their fans in 2003, no mention of them actually booing Porto going up to get the trophy. Dida is a twat, the guy who tapped him is a bigger fool, but all this "omg Celtic shouldn't get punished because it was only one guy and it doesn't reflect on the support" - yeah and Rangers got fined for a Celtic fan chaining themselves to a goal post at Ibrox last year :cool:

can't have it two ways boys I don't think the points should be or will be taken off anyway, so the papers can stop whinging away. Quite interesting to see that one of the best ever away results from a Scottish team (Rangers in Lyon) was wiped off the sports pages today as well, it's almost as if it didn't happen :o

allygator

It was a genuine question as I can't recall what happened no need to start the one upmanship.

retired_oldfierce

Beating the European champions bit more important

Rangers fans, always dying for publicity

retired_kellynew1212

So unbiased

Dida's behaviour is only secondary here. The primary issue is the lack of security provided by Celtic. A fan was allowed to enter the pitch, and make contact with a player. The fact no real harm was done doesn't matter either.

A fine for Celtic will achieve nothing - many fans won't care the club has to pay 10-30K. So the correct punishment would be a fine, and 2 games behind closed doors. Not too hopeful about that though

Dida will be fined. If Celtic push for anything more than that - they will be in trouble. Milan did not want to make an issue out of the incindent, but if their Gk is threatened with a ban - they can easily prove Celtic is at fault for letting that fan out there in the first place. And Dida's sub will easily be explained as a "psycological trauma" from being touched by a drunk scot during the game </BLOCKQUOTE>

He wasn't drunk, there was footage of him later in the stands standing on one foot, tieing his shoe lace, standing on the other foot and tieing his other shoe lace and then get back up without losing his balace.. now I'd love to see a drunk who could do that!

retired_oldfierce

Was there?

Anyway, he admitted he had been drinking before the game at his court case.

retired_amclin3

So unbiased

Dida's behaviour is only secondary here. The primary issue is the lack of security provided by Celtic. A fan was allowed to enter the pitch, and make contact with a player. The fact no real harm was done doesn't matter either.

A fine for Celtic will achieve nothing - many fans won't care the club has to pay 10-30K. So the correct punishment would be a fine, and 2 games behind closed doors. Not too hopeful about that though

Dida will be fined. If Celtic push for anything more than that - they will be in trouble. Milan did not want to make an issue out of the incindent, but if their Gk is threatened with a ban - they can easily prove Celtic is at fault for letting that fan out there in the first place. And Dida's sub will easily be explained as a "psycological trauma" from being touched by a drunk scot during the game </BLOCKQUOTE>

He wasn't drunk, there was footage of him later in the stands standing on one foot, tieing his shoe lace, standing on the other foot and tieing his other shoe lace and then get back up without losing his balace.. now I'd love to see a drunk who could do that! </BLOCKQUOTE>

Does that really change anything?