retired_charlene

if i ever bought one, it would be a henry. definitely.

retired_mika318

Another one for the Dyson fan club tbh.

retired_princess160

michaelwoodcock

Henry was the other that was suggested to me by my Gran, who is knowledgeable about housework stuff. Half the price of a dyson. They have bags though.

retired_hautemarley

I also need a new vacuum cleaner but there is absolutely no way Im spending £200. £100 tops and that's pushing it tbh.

marynot

hoover then :thup:

retired_jhr2211

It depends on convenience doesn't it.

You can spend £200 on a dyson and have years of no bags hassle or cleaning filters (although most dysons have 1).

Or you can spend less and put up with bags and filters.

Horses for courses really.

michaelwoodcock

Not a case of convenience for me, I want a dependable cleaner, something that isn't going to lose power. If I can do it for less than £200, then great. I was simply under the impression that bagless >>>>>>>>> bagged.

retired_hautemarley

True, My reason is purely financial tbh.

retired_salemcobol

I can suck up the kids toys with my dyson, meaning I can both tidy up there stuff and hoover the floor at the same time, who said men can`t multi-task !

Dysons look cool with toy soldiers flying round and round inside them