retired_superpenners

Dunno if you have noticed on your rounds, but porno-tape queen, yet iI'm innocent really' looking Keely Hazell has decided to release 2 calendars for 2008.

The first one is your usual tits and ass page 3 rubbish.

She has also released a 2nd - which has a black cover and is usually still wrapped up so you cant see it and on the back it shows you nothing

http://img144.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc641&image=3...ey1681_123_641lo.jpg

Would just like to warn you, by the power of the internet, that its rubbish - and dont bother buying into it because it says it 'contains nudity' on the cover. It doesn't and its crap.

allygator

Trade description act surely

retired_barbie34

If she's topless in any won't that be classed as nudity?

retired_superpenners

Shes topless in both, yet the second one holds this bit of mystery that your getting something else - and you're not.

retired_superpenners

Am I allowed to post the cover for her other one or is that copyright and all that crap?

retired_prettygirl9156

does it not say "Contains Mild Nudity" on the front?

So what Fran said

retired_ramilne

'contains mild nudity'

retired_uxsillyxgoose

yeah not sure why you would expect her growler out there mate

retired_gulkis

no idea who she is but she's obviously well aware of the stupidity of her target audience. just think of it as a ******* tax.

retired_vini

Yup what Fran and wcr said.