retired_heidus17

Perhaps the Premiership side that would least need improvement in midfield? </BLOCKQUOTE>

and barcelona were probably the team who least needed henry

that is to say, it misses my point

retired_charytine

More chance of him retiring than playing for that garbage regardless of the money.

retired_liani

If he was to end up moving to Chelsea and collect his £750,000 a month, i have a feeling he could be a bit of a dissapointment.

But i doubt he'll move anyway, aslong the ageing Milan side can hold itself together when they finally lose there legs.

retired_sedimohasel

Or when they finally don't get to play the CL after it has been proven that they cheated to get there

retired_joeyq911

because roman didn't become a billionaire by being stupid. times a billion.

retired_janae55

Would love to see him play for us, because he's currently my favourite player alongside Drogba and Essien, etc. But I highly doubt that he would ever come to us just for money. Didn't he state he would like to play in the EPL, only for Man Utd and Arsenal where they have a more adventurous attacking style?

retired_katie14

Didn’t Real Madrid say they made over £200m from Beckham’s time at the club?

Don’t think a £100m player is that much of an unbelievable prospect if he’s a proven marketing tool. There aren’t many players who fall into that category at the moment though. Beckham and Ronaldinho are probably the two most marketable footballers on the planet, not sure where Kaka stands.

retired_khabmth

Perhaps the Premiership side that would least need improvement in midfield? </BLOCKQUOTE>

I think he'd be a slight upgrade from Flamini. </BLOCKQUOTE>

But your point is flawed as he wouldn't take Flaminis place.

The real question is would he be an improvement on Fabregas? Sure but not by much in the long run.

retired_khabmth

I think it is quite a good point actually.

Barca was a world class team with only 1 world class striker so it's quite natural that they went for one more (especially with Etoo's injury last season).

So does Arsenal have an abundance of MC's of Kaka's quality? No, no one has. But do we have an abundance of MC's with more than enough quality? I'd say clearly and I guess most Gunners would agree.

retired_jessicadon

Kaka really a MC? Especially of the type we have plenty, i.e Denilson, Diaby, Cesc, Bert, Flamini, Diarra........?

Nope, but it's not relevant anyway as he's not leaving f**king Milan for Arsenal.

Good to see Chelsea fans thinking they have an abundance of midfielders that would see them turn down Kaka though. All about the creativity and flair that side.