retired_jessicadon

The entire point of Lamarr is his inate twatishness no?

retired_pneeru

Exactly. And that makes him better than Amstell

retired_jennifer89889

No, because there are good twats and there are smug twatty bad twats, Lamarr is the latter.

BobbyK

whs. Amstell still on a par though for me. His demolitions of Preston and that twat who thinks he's a rebel, Danny something I think, were just immense. The punky rebel Danny person episode was one of my favourites.

retired_jessicadon

Again, isn't that it? No act from either of them, you're getting two big personalities who are going to antagonise and dismiss.

Not disagreeing with you btw, quite the opposite, i preferred Amstel.

retired_jennifer89889

Well it'd work if he actually used it well, but most of the time (from what i've seen) he's just a bottom-feeding suck up.

retired_jessicadon

To be fair, i think it worked really well in the early days when he actually just hosted the show, put a bity of needle in and had the occasional laugh. He did turn into an oddly bitter twat by the end.

You don't like him, do you?

retired_jennifer89889

No, he's just a snivelling little ****** who's not funny at all and never was IMO.

retired_roxy

Lamarr was awesome. I liked him even better towards the end when he plainly didn't give two sh*ts about it anymore and just did whatever he wanted.

Amstell is great too though, but he won't even be Lamarr.