Rob1981

her insurance would pay though, no? she's not dipping into her own pocket for it

Red_Hector

Sue the MPV for not being in neutral with the handbrake on while at a stop.

pandaLUFC

Ask Declan Swan.

Retro

This is what somebody said to me today which has altered my perspective slightly. He said I'd be taking money off the insurance company - not her. She's already knackered in terms of her insurance.

Retro

I'm not sure about neutral, but she claims her handrake was on. So was mine which is what stopped me going into the car in front of me.

DJ

I got hit from behind when in California (I mean, my car did, easy now). My rental was a write-off, but because I saw it coming I assumed the position and didn't come to any harm whatsoever.

People later called me a fool for not suing the heck out of the guy who hit me. Disgusting attitude tbh :thdn:

merry_miller

No reason not to go for it if that's the case then.

Plus if she's been driving for a few years anyway she's likely to have protected no claims

Sir Bert Preast

This is what somebody said to me today which has altered my perspective slightly. He said I'd be taking money off the insurance company - not her. She's already knackered in terms of her insurance. </BLOCKQUOTE>

Victimless crime, eh?

Aslan

I'd need a proper injury. Stiffness, soreness etc not enough. I've you tore a muscle or damaged a nerve I'd have no qualms in claiming.

something less annoying

I'd claim because if you happened to make the same mistake next week you'd probably get claimed against.