retired_bibitte

playing into his hands right there

retired_flamindragon1986

crouch to start please & pennant

retired_bball3378

Robinson wasn't in goal for them.

retired_heidus17

yeah, my original post was a joke.

should have been a red though, correct decision influenced by a player seems better than incorrect decision to me

retired_musiclova31

yeah, discussion over.

go read the rules, then try again.

retired_musiclova31

precisely.

retired_heidus17

yeah, discussion over.

go read the rules, then try again. </BLOCKQUOTE>

Denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity to an opponent moving towards the player's
goal by an offence punishable by a free kick or a penalty kick?

If he is the last man, which he was (other than the keeper obviously) then I don't see how it's not a clear goal-socring oppurtunity.

Are you honestly saying it shouldn't have been a red?

retired_musiclova31

for the last time, last man does not automatically equal red ffs.

this wasn't a blatant handball on the line. gerrard was wide in the box, running at pace. there is guarantee he was even going to get a shot at goal never mind being denied a "clear goal scoring opportunity" anyway.

who cares? fact remains that clattenburg patently thought it was worth only a yellow til stevie g offered to fellate him after the game...

retired_heidus17

hey, you were the one who asked why a yellow would be wrong. i was merely saying why, and from the replays seems clear to me gearrd would have got a decent shot on goal, denied by being tripped up.

if you want to complain about gerrard influencing the ref then fine, but complaining about the red seems as biased as people saying kuyt didnt deserve a red or that it shouldnt of been a penalty when carragher fouled whoever it was.

2boxers

or he reached for the yellow, thought "hang on last man" and replaced it with a red

PK not FK blame the linesman for not correcting him, it was a red,he should have gone

anyway done and dusted onto tonight's game yeah?